• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
System for laboratory proficiency testing in bacteriology: organisation and impact on microbiology laboratories in health care facilities funded by the Ontario Government.细菌学实验室能力验证系统:安大略省政府资助的医疗机构中微生物实验室的组织与影响
J Clin Pathol. 1982 Jan;35(1):94-100. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.1.94.
2
LPTP's (Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program) educational assistance program (EAP)--a review.
Can J Med Technol. 1992;54(2):82-8.
3
Quality improvement of diagnostic microbiology through a peer-group proficiency assessment program. A 20-year experience in Ontario. The Microbiology Committee.通过同行熟练度评估计划提高诊断微生物学质量。安大略省的20年经验。微生物学委员会。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 May;120(5):445-55.
4
Canadian experience in cytology proficiency testing.
Acta Cytol. 1989 Jul-Aug;33(4):484-6.
5
The United Kingdom national microbiological quality assessment scheme.英国国家微生物质量评估计划。
J Clin Pathol. 1982 Jan;35(1):82-93. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.1.82.
6
An overview of quality control practices in Ontario with particular reference to cholesterol analysis.安大略省质量控制实践概述,特别提及胆固醇分析。
Clin Biochem. 1999 Mar;32(2):93-9. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(98)00103-9.
7
The significance of matrix effects on the measurement of lactate dehydrogenase (LD) activity using Kodak dry slide technology in the Ontario Laboratory Proficiency Testing Program.基质效应在安大略省实验室能力验证计划中使用柯达干式载片技术测定乳酸脱氢酶(LD)活性时的意义。
Clin Biochem. 1990 Apr;23(2):179-81. doi: 10.1016/0009-9120(90)80033-f.
8
Quality assurance in clinical bacteriology--a continuous development in Hungary since 1927.临床细菌学中的质量保证——自1927年以来匈牙利的持续发展。
Acta Microbiol Hung. 1993;40(3):239-47.
9
Quality assurance in the mycobacteriology laboratory. Quality control, quality improvement, and proficiency testing.分枝杆菌学实验室的质量保证。质量控制、质量改进和能力验证。
Clin Lab Med. 1996 Sep;16(3):657-75.
10
Clinical microbiology quality assurance program: a Taiwan experience.
Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1995 May;28(2):95-108.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality control performance in a provincial veterinary diagnostic microbiology laboratory system.省级兽医诊断微生物学实验室系统中的质量控制绩效
Can Vet J. 1986 Mar;27(3):146-9.
2
Evolving approaches to management of quality in clinical microbiology.临床微生物学质量控制的不断发展的管理方法。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1994 Jan;7(1):55-88. doi: 10.1128/CMR.7.1.55.
3
Relationship between performance in three of the Centers for Disease Control microbiology proficiency testing programs and the number of actual patient specimens tested by participating laboratories.美国疾病控制中心微生物学能力验证测试项目中三项测试的表现与参与实验室实际检测的患者样本数量之间的关系。
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):246-50. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.246-250.1986.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical laboratory improvement program in New York City. II. Progress after five years of experience.纽约市临床实验室改进计划。II. 五年经验后的进展。
Health Lab Sci. 1970 Oct;7(4):242-55.
2
Quality control in bacteriology: preliminary trials.细菌学中的质量控制:初步试验
J Clin Pathol. 1971 Dec;24(9):790-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.24.9.790.
3
Quality control in microbiology. I. Utilization of reference laboratory data.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 Sep;62(3):407-11. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/62.3.407.
4
A practical system of bacterial nomenclature.一个实用的细菌命名系统。
J Clin Pathol. 1975 Sep;28(9):746-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.28.9.746.
5
A regional quality control program in microbiology. I. Administrative aspects.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Aug;66(2):401-6. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/66.2.401.
6
A regional quality control program in microbiology. II. Advantages of simulated clinical specimens.微生物学领域的区域质量控制计划。II. 模拟临床标本的优势。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Aug;66(2):407-15. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/66.2.407.
7
The impact of laboratory improvement programs on laboratory performance: the CLIA 67 experience.实验室改进计划对实验室绩效的影响:临床实验室改进修正案67的经验
Health Lab Sci. 1977 Jul;14(3):213-23.

细菌学实验室能力验证系统:安大略省政府资助的医疗机构中微生物实验室的组织与影响

System for laboratory proficiency testing in bacteriology: organisation and impact on microbiology laboratories in health care facilities funded by the Ontario Government.

作者信息

Whitby J L, Black W A, Richardson H, Wood D E

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 1982 Jan;35(1):94-100. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.1.94.

DOI:10.1136/jcp.35.1.94
PMID:7061723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC497454/
Abstract

The Ministry of Health requires that all medical laboratories in the Province of Ontario participate in a laboratory proficiency testing program (LPTP). In bacteriology compliance has been excellent. Eighty-six laboratories, for various reasons over the period under review, have surrendered their licence or, because of poor performance on LPTP test surveys, have had their licence withdrawn by the Ministry. The highest percentage of withdrawals occurred in small hospitals in isolated areas. In April 1979 there were 249 participating laboratories. Participants' results are first analysed by computer, and, subsequently, approximately 20% of participants' reports are reviewed by the Committee. Various Committee actions ensue: correspondence with the laboratory director regarding errors; an offer of a visit; and possibly a report via a senior LPTP committee to the Ministry that a laboratory is non-proficient and, in LPTP's terms of reference, non-remediable. Subsequent Ministry action might be the withdrawal of a laboratory's licence. However, this last recourse only occurs when educational efforts have proved ineffectual. Overall, performance in LPTP bacteriology surveys has improved over the period 1975-8, with 68% of 263 laboratories achieving a score of 70% or higher and 26% of 263 laboratories scoring less than 60%.

摘要

卫生部要求安大略省的所有医学实验室都要参加实验室能力验证计划(LPTP)。在细菌学方面,合规情况非常好。在审查期间,有86家实验室由于各种原因放弃了执照,或者因为在LPTP测试调查中表现不佳而被卫生部吊销了执照。吊销执照比例最高的是偏远地区的小医院。1979年4月,有249家参与实验室。参与者的结果首先由计算机进行分析,随后,委员会会对大约20%的参与者报告进行审查。委员会会采取各种行动:就错误问题与实验室主任通信;提出进行访问;并可能通过LPTP高级委员会向卫生部报告某实验室不具备能力且按照LPTP的职权范围无法补救。卫生部随后可能采取的行动是吊销实验室的执照。然而,只有在教育努力证明无效时才会采取这最后的措施。总体而言,在1975年至198年期间,LPTP细菌学调查的表现有所改善,263家实验室中有68%的得分达到70%或更高,263家实验室中有26%的得分低于60%。