Griffin C W, Mehaffey M A, Cook E C, Blumer S O, Podeszwik P A
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):246-50. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.246-250.1986.
The performance of laboratories enrolled in three of the Centers for Disease Control microbiology performance evaluation programs was studied in relation to the number of actual patient specimens tested by the laboratories. Laboratories were grouped according to the number of specimens tested weekly to compare performance among the groups. Results of the study showed that laboratories, as a group, that tested large numbers of specimens performed better than laboratories that tested small numbers. The infrequency of performing certain tests or identifying certain microbial species can be an important factor in laboratory error. One strategy for laboratories that cannot resolve internal problems associated with low testing volumes would be to limit their testing to procedures that are done well.
对参加疾病控制中心三个微生物学性能评估项目的实验室的表现,与这些实验室检测的实际患者标本数量进行了研究。实验室根据每周检测的标本数量进行分组,以比较各组之间的表现。研究结果表明,作为一个整体,检测大量标本的实验室比检测少量标本的实验室表现更好。某些检测或鉴定某些微生物种类的频率过低可能是实验室误差的一个重要因素。对于那些无法解决与低检测量相关的内部问题的实验室来说,一种策略是将检测限制在做得好的程序上。