Webster R O, Larsen G L, Mitchell B C, Goins A J, Henson P M
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Mar;125(3):335-40. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1982.125.3.335.
Systemic activation of the complement system results in the generation of chemotactic factors that have been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory pulmonary diseases such as the adult respiratory distress syndrome. This led us to ask whether systemic complement activation by cobra venom factor (CVF) or intravascularly administered zymosan-activated rabbit plasma (ZAP) or rabbit C5a would result in lung injury. As had been described previously for CVF and ZAP, intravenously administered rabbit C5a also caused an acute neutropenia along with sequestration of neutrophils within the pulmonary vasculature. However, no significant lung inflammation as measured by neutrophil emigration or increased vascular permeability occurred with any of the three stimuli. Only when these agents were combined with anesthesia, surgical manipulation, and intubation did significant neutrophil emigration into alveoli occur, but again without any change in vascular permeability. After administration of ZAP, a decrease in dynamic compliance and an increase in pulmonary resistance as well as a transient period of hypoxemia occurred that was not observed after CVF or rabbit C5a treatment. Thus, our studies suggest that changes in lung function after ZAP instillation may not represent changes from complement activation alone in that they are not reproduced with CVF or rabbit C5a. We conclude that complement activation, as an isolated event, may be an insufficient insult in the lung to produce significant lung injury.
补体系统的全身激活会导致趋化因子的产生,这些趋化因子被认为在诸如成人呼吸窘迫综合征等炎症性肺部疾病的发病机制中起作用。这促使我们探究用眼镜蛇毒因子(CVF)、血管内注射酵母聚糖激活的兔血浆(ZAP)或兔C5a进行全身补体激活是否会导致肺损伤。正如先前对CVF和ZAP所描述的那样,静脉注射兔C5a也会导致急性中性粒细胞减少,并伴有中性粒细胞在肺血管系统中的滞留。然而,这三种刺激中的任何一种都未引起通过中性粒细胞渗出或血管通透性增加所衡量的明显肺部炎症。只有当这些药物与麻醉、手术操作和插管相结合时,才会有明显的中性粒细胞向肺泡内渗出,但血管通透性同样没有任何变化。注射ZAP后,出现了动态顺应性降低、肺阻力增加以及短暂的低氧血症期,而在CVF或兔C5a治疗后未观察到这种情况。因此,我们的研究表明,注射ZAP后肺功能的变化可能并不单纯代表补体激活所引起的变化,因为CVF或兔C5a并未出现同样的变化。我们得出结论,补体激活作为一个单独的事件,可能不足以对肺部造成严重的肺损伤。