Rothenberger A, Szirtes J, Jürgens R
Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970). 1982;231(2):155-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00343837.
Acoustic evoked potentials to meaningful words were recorded in healthy, aphasic, and right hemisphere-damaged subjects under four conditions: monaural left and right, binaural, and dichotic stimulation. Four major findings emerged. First, healthy and brain-damaged subjects differed in amplitude and latency values of the N1 and P2 components. In healthy subjects N1 was greater and P2 smaller than in aphasics. Both components peaked earlier inpatients than in normals. Second, evoked potentials of healthy subjects showed a late sustained component which was decreased in aphasics. Third, the latencies of P1 and N1 as well as the amplitude of N1 showed a "pathway effect", i.e. shorter latency and greater amplitude to contralateral stimulation. Fourth, under the dichotic condition, P1 and N1 peaked earlier over the left hemisphere. The N1 amplitude behaved differently in the three groups depending upon stimulating conditions. It is suggested that these differences reflect linguistic coding and related attentional processes in patients and normals.
在四种条件下记录了健康人、失语症患者和右半球损伤患者对有意义词语的听觉诱发电位:单耳左、右、双耳和双耳分听刺激。出现了四个主要发现。第一,健康人和脑损伤患者在N1和P2成分的振幅和潜伏期值上存在差异。在健康受试者中,N1比失语症患者更大,P2更小。这两个成分在患者中比正常人更早达到峰值。第二,健康受试者的诱发电位显示出一个晚期持续成分,在失语症患者中该成分减少。第三,P1和N1的潜伏期以及N1的振幅显示出“通路效应”,即对侧刺激的潜伏期更短、振幅更大。第四,在双耳分听条件下,P1和N1在左半球更早达到峰值。根据刺激条件,N1振幅在三组中的表现不同。有人认为,这些差异反映了患者和正常人的语言编码及相关的注意力过程。