Suppr超能文献

考来替泊与氯贝丁酯治疗IIa型高脂蛋白血症的疗效比较

Comparative efficacy of colestipol and clofibrate in type IIa hyperlipoproteinemia.

作者信息

Vecchio T J, Linden C V, O'Connell M J, Heilman J

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1982 Apr;142(4):721-3.

PMID:7073415
Abstract

A multiclinic study was performed comparing colestipol hydrochloride, clofibrate, and placebo in 245 patients with type IIa hyperlipoproteinemia. Eighty-five subjects took colestipol hydrochloride in progressive doses of 15, 20, and 30 g/day; 87 took 2.0 g/day of clofibrate; and 73 took placebo over the six months of study. Colestipol lowered total cholesterol level 20.9% in comparison with clofibrate (14.6%) (statistically significant at months 3, 5, and 6), and lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level 28.8% in comparison with clofibrate (14.8%) (significant at months 2, 4, and 6, all times measured). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol level remained unchanged in all groups. Clofibrate lowered total triglyceride levels 22.5%, compared with an increase of 12.5% in the colestipol group and 11.1% in the placebo group (significant at all time intervals). Colestipol was more effective than clofibrate in lowering the cholesterol fractions associated with increased cardiovascular risk.

摘要

对245例IIa型高脂蛋白血症患者进行了一项多中心研究,比较了盐酸考来烯胺、氯贝丁酯和安慰剂的效果。85名受试者服用盐酸考来烯胺,剂量逐渐增加至每日15、20和30克;87名受试者每日服用2.0克氯贝丁酯;73名受试者在为期6个月的研究中服用安慰剂。与氯贝丁酯(14.6%)相比,考来烯胺使总胆固醇水平降低了20.9%(在第3、5和6个月具有统计学意义),与氯贝丁酯(14.8%)相比,考来烯胺使低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平降低了28.8%(在第2、4和6个月均有显著差异,所有时间点均进行了测量)。所有组的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平均保持不变。与考来烯胺组增加12.5%和安慰剂组增加11.1%相比,氯贝丁酯使总甘油三酯水平降低了22.5%(在所有时间间隔均有显著差异)。考来烯胺在降低与心血管风险增加相关的胆固醇组分方面比氯贝丁酯更有效。

相似文献

2
Effect of colestipol and clofibrate on plasma lipid and lipoproteins in type IIa hyperlipoproteinemia.
Metabolism. 1981 Jun;30(6):605-9. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(81)90140-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse effects of hypolipidaemic drugs.
Med Toxicol. 1987 Jan-Feb;2(1):10-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03259858.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验