• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The 1977 College of American Pathologists Enzymology Survey. Principal findings.

作者信息

Grannis G F, Massion C G

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1978 Sep;70(3 Suppl):487-502.

PMID:707414
Abstract

A set of linearly related serum survey specimens was analyzed by more than 200 laboratories on four occasions in 1977 for the five enzymes lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate and alanine aminotransferases, creatine phosphokinase, and alkaline phosphatase. The survey technic, which employs specimens that are designed to have multiple informational redundancies for detecting discrepancies in the survey data, was found to be a feasible approach, as a variety of methodologic biases and analytic problems were readily detected. The specimens were shown to be stable,and the mean results obtained by a reference group of laboratories were quite reproducible. Consequently, changes observed in individual laboratories in successive surveys were attributable to intra-laboratory changes. The survey provides each participant with an objective evaluation of the linearity, precision, and calibration of his methods, in comparison with peer and reference laboratories, as well as information concerning the popularities of various methods, and the performances of various analytic systems. For each enzyme there are a few large peer groups and a large number of small peer groups. Differences among the laboratories within each peer group were due primarily to proportional biases that in some cases were clearly due to instrumental or reagent differences, rather than to methodologic differences.

摘要

相似文献

1
The 1977 College of American Pathologists Enzymology Survey. Principal findings.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1978 Sep;70(3 Suppl):487-502.
2
The 1978 College of American Pathologists survey of analyses of five serum enzymes by 450 laboratories.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1979 Aug;72(2 Suppl):285-98.
3
Interlaboratory survey of enzyme analyses. I. Preliminary.酶分析的实验室间调查。I. 初步报告。
Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Jul;66(1):206-22.
4
Interlaboratory survey of enzymatic analyses. II. Intermediate studies.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1977 Jul;68(1 Suppl):142-52.
5
Interlaboratory survey of Enzyme Analyses iii. Does College of American Pathologists' survey serum mimic clinical specimens?
Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Oct;76(4 Suppl):554-66.
6
Survey of serum enzyme analyses. Human tissues as a source of enzymes.血清酶分析调查。作为酶来源的人体组织。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1984 Dec;108(12):949-53.
7
Interlaboratory survey of enzyme analyses: V. A simplified method of reporting participants' data.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1983 Oct;80(4 Suppl):577-84.
8
Determination of reference ranges for serum enzymes via a large interlaboratory survey.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987 Jan;111(1):9-15.
9
Analytic clinical laboratory precision. State of the art for selected enzymes.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Oct;78(4 Suppl):634-43.
10
[Quality control of enzyme activity measurements in the serum].[血清中酶活性测定的质量控制]
Z Klin Chem Klin Biochem. 1970 May;8(3):212-7.