Orr J W, Shingleton H M, Hatch K D, Mann W J, Austin J M, Soong S J
Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jun;59(6):726-31.
Between October 1969 and December 1980, radical hysterectomies were performed on 311 patients at the University of Alabama Medical Center in Birmingham. The hospital records of these patients were reviewed for perioperative morbidity. One hundred twenty-two patients (39.2%) had had previous cold knife conization. The conization to radical hysterectomy interval varied between 48 hours and 8 weeks. An analysis of the perioperative morbidity was performed comparing patients with to those without prior conization. Previous cervical conization, regardless of the interval, was not associated with increased hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, or febrile morbidity in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. These findings suggest that a radical hysterectomy may be safely performed after cervical conization, regardless of the intervening interval.
1969年10月至1980年12月期间,位于伯明翰的阿拉巴马大学医学中心为311例患者实施了根治性子宫切除术。对这些患者的医院记录进行了围手术期发病率审查。122例患者(39.2%)曾接受过冷刀锥切术。锥切术至根治性子宫切除术的间隔时间在48小时至8周之间。对围手术期发病率进行了分析,比较了有和没有先前锥切术的患者。既往宫颈锥切术,无论间隔时间长短,与接受根治性子宫切除术患者的住院时间延长、手术时间、失血量或发热发病率增加均无关。这些发现表明,无论间隔时间如何,宫颈锥切术后均可安全地实施根治性子宫切除术。