• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠中三分之一段癌行根治性切除和全切除的长期结果

Long term results of restorative resection and total excision for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum.

作者信息

McDermott F, Hughes E, Pihl E, Milne B J, Price A

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Jun;154(6):833-7.

PMID:7079924
Abstract

Restorative resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum has been facilitated by the recent introduction of the staplers. Before restorative resection with end-to-end anastomosis can become the treatment of choice, it must be proved that survival prospects after restorative resection are similar to those obtained after total abdominoperineal excision. The results of curative restorative resection and total excision in 417 patients with a single carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum managed by one of us are examined. Between 1950 and 1980, the proportion of patients treated by restorative resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum increased from 26 to 93 per cent. Distribution by sex, age, tumor stage and tumor differentiation did not differ significantly between the two groups of patients operated upon. Cancer specific survival did not differ significantly between patients treated by restorative resection or total excision. Ten year survival rates were 60 and 59 per cent, respectively. Survival related to tumor stage and differentiation was not influenced by the type of operation. Tumor size, greater--p less than 0.04--in patients managed by total excision, had no significant influence on survival prospects. The results justify sphincter preservation and suggest that increased usage of restorative resection by stapling technique is not likely to lessen survival prospects in patients with carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum.

摘要

吻合器的近期问世促进了直肠中1/3癌的根治性切除。在端端吻合的根治性切除成为首选治疗方法之前,必须证明根治性切除后的生存前景与经腹会阴联合全切除后的生存前景相似。我们对417例直肠中1/3单发癌患者采用根治性切除和全切除的结果进行了研究。1950年至1980年间,直肠中1/3癌采用根治性切除治疗的患者比例从26%增至93%。两组手术患者的性别、年龄、肿瘤分期和肿瘤分化分布无显著差异。根治性切除或全切除治疗的患者癌症特异性生存率无显著差异。10年生存率分别为60%和59%。与肿瘤分期和分化相关的生存情况不受手术类型的影响。在接受全切除治疗的患者中,肿瘤大小(p<0.04)对生存前景无显著影响。这些结果证明保留括约肌是合理的,并表明通过吻合技术增加根治性切除的应用不太可能降低直肠中1/3癌患者的生存前景。

相似文献

1
Long term results of restorative resection and total excision for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum.直肠中三分之一段癌行根治性切除和全切除的长期结果
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Jun;154(6):833-7.
2
Oncological outcome of ultra-low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the lower third of the rectum: Comparison of intrapelvic double-stapled anastomosis and transanal coloanal anastomosis.直肠下三分之一癌行超低位前切除术加全直肠系膜切除术的肿瘤学结局:盆腔内双吻合器吻合与经肛门结肠肛管吻合的比较。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 Nov-Dec;52(66):1692-7.
3
[Total excision of the mesorectum in cancer of the lower and middle rectum. Oncological and functional results].[中低位直肠癌的直肠系膜全切除。肿瘤学及功能学结果]
Chirurg. 2003 Feb;74(2):125-31. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0558-6.
4
Long-term outcome of anastomosis leakage after curative resection for mid and low rectal cancer.中低位直肠癌根治性切除术后吻合口漏的长期结局
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 Nov-Dec;50(54):1898-902.
5
Immediate radical resection after local excision of rectal cancer: an oncologic compromise?直肠癌局部切除术后立即行根治性切除:一种肿瘤学上的妥协?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):429-37. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0900-9.
6
Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.多媒体文章。腹腔镜超低位前切除术联合结肠J形贮袋肛管吻合术。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1710-1. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9322-4. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
7
[Rectum carcinoma. Optimizing therapy by deep resection or excision].
Zentralbl Chir. 1999;124(5):422-7.
8
Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.影响直肠癌全直肠系膜切除充分性的因素。
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Nov;9(9):808-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01256.x. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
9
[Low anterior resection versus rectum amputation for treatment of rectal cancer].[低位前切除术与直肠切除术治疗直肠癌的比较]
Helv Chir Acta. 1994 Jul;60(5):701-5.
10
Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer: correlation with rectal cancer regression grade.局部晚期直肠癌的术前放化疗及全直肠系膜切除术:与直肠癌退缩分级的相关性
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2025-31. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0713-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival and recurrence after low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: the results of a long-term study with a review of the literature.直肠癌低位前切除术和腹会阴联合切除术的生存率及复发情况:一项长期研究结果并文献综述
Surg Today. 1993;23(1):21-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00308995.
2
An analysis of survival and treatment failure following abdominoperineal and sphincter-saving resection in Dukes' B and C rectal carcinoma. A report of the NSABP clinical trials. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project.Dukes' B和C期直肠癌经腹会阴切除术和保留括约肌切除术的生存及治疗失败分析。NSABP临床试验报告。国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目
Ann Surg. 1986 Oct;204(4):480-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198610000-00016.
3
Endosonographic staging of rectal carcinoma.
直肠癌的内镜超声分期
Gastrointest Radiol. 1987;12(4):289-95. doi: 10.1007/BF01885164.
4
Anastomosis or stoma for low rectal cancer?低位直肠癌的吻合术还是造口术?
Postgrad Med J. 1989 Mar;65(761):144-9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.65.761.144.