• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复诊断性腹腔灌洗的意义。

Significance of repeating diagnostic peritoneal lavage.

作者信息

Alyono D, Perry J F

出版信息

Surgery. 1982 Jun;91(6):656-9.

PMID:7079966
Abstract

The value of repeating diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) when initial results are indeterminate or negative has not been defined. From January 1974 to June 1980, 1884 patients underwent DPL. Ninety-six had repeat DPL. Eighty-eight (4.7%) patients with indeterminate initial DPL results had repeat DPL. Results were true positive in 20, false positive in non, false negative in three, and true negative in 64 patients. If results for all 88 patients had initially been considered positive and all had undergone operation, the additional yield would have been low, three patients (3.4%); 64 patients would have undergone unnecessary laparotomy. If all 88 results had been considered negative, 20 patients (23%) with intra-abdominal injuries would have been diagnosed late or not at all. Eight patients with initial negative DPL but with persistent abdominal pain underwent repeat DPL. Results were true positive in three, false negative in one, and true negative in four. Repeat lavage has an accuracy of 95.8%, sensitivity of 85.2%, and specificity of 100%; with repeat lavage, DPL overall has high accuracy (98.4%), sensitivity (94.2%), and specificity (99.7%). Repeat lavage can be helpful in evaluating patients with initial negative lavage but with persistent abdominal pain. Repeat lavage is also indicated when initial results are indeterminate.

摘要

当初次诊断性腹腔灌洗(DPL)结果不确定或为阴性时,重复进行DPL的价值尚未明确。1974年1月至1980年6月,1884例患者接受了DPL。其中96例进行了重复DPL。初次DPL结果不确定的88例(4.7%)患者进行了重复DPL。结果显示,20例为真阳性,无一例假阳性,3例假阴性,64例为真阴性。如果最初将所有88例患者的结果都视为阳性并全部进行手术,额外的阳性率会很低,仅3例(3.4%);64例患者将接受不必要的剖腹手术。如果将所有88例结果都视为阴性,20例(23%)有腹腔内损伤的患者将被延迟诊断或根本无法诊断。8例初次DPL结果为阴性但持续腹痛的患者接受了重复DPL。结果显示,3例为真阳性,1例假阴性,4例为真阴性。重复灌洗的准确率为95.8%,敏感度为85.2%,特异度为100%;加上重复灌洗,DPL总体的准确率较高(98.4%)、敏感度(94.2%)和特异度(99.7%)。重复灌洗有助于评估初次灌洗结果为阴性但持续腹痛的患者。当初次结果不确定时,也需要进行重复灌洗。

相似文献

1
Significance of repeating diagnostic peritoneal lavage.重复诊断性腹腔灌洗的意义。
Surgery. 1982 Jun;91(6):656-9.
2
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the management of blunt abdominal trauma: a reassessment.诊断性腹腔灌洗在钝性腹部创伤处理中的应用:重新评估
J Trauma. 1987 Jan;27(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198701000-00001.
3
Abdominopelvic computerized tomography and open peritoneal lavage in patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a prospective study.钝性腹部创伤患者的腹盆腔计算机断层扫描和开放性腹腔灌洗:一项前瞻性研究。
Can J Surg. 1987 Jan;30(1):10-3.
4
Management of patients with indeterminate diagnostic peritoneal lavage results following blunt trauma.
J Trauma. 1991 Dec;31(12):1627-31. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199112000-00011.
5
Clinical uses of diagnostic peritoneal lavage in stab wounds of the anterior abdomen: a prospective study.诊断性腹腔灌洗在前腹壁刺伤中的临床应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Surg. 2002;168(8-9):490-3. doi: 10.1080/110241502321116514.
6
Aspiration of free blood from the peritoneal cavity does not mandate immediate laparotomy.从腹腔抽吸游离血液并不一定需要立即进行剖腹手术。
Am Surg. 1995 Sep;61(9):790-5.
7
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma victims.钝性腹部创伤患者的诊断性腹腔灌洗
Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Jun;5(2):231-4.
8
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: accuracy in predicting necessary laparotomy following blunt and penetrating trauma.诊断性腹腔灌洗:钝性和穿透性创伤后预测必要剖腹手术的准确性。
J Trauma. 1990 Nov;30(11):1345-55.
9
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage as an indicator for therapeutic surgery.诊断性腹腔灌洗作为治疗性手术的一项指标。
Can J Surg. 1991 Oct;34(5):471-6.
10
A prospective study of 91 patients undergoing both computed tomography and peritoneal lavage following blunt abdominal trauma.一项针对91例钝性腹部创伤后接受计算机断层扫描和腹腔灌洗的患者的前瞻性研究。
J Trauma. 1986 Jul;26(7):602-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198607000-00003.