Martin W, Sachs V, Weise W
Z Rechtsmed. 1982;88(1-2):31-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00200733.
The introduction of a standardized paternity in index (PI) for the statistical evaluation of blood group findings in cases of disputed paternity is proposed and explained. Using the PI X/Y as a parameter, it is not necessary to give the probability of paternity in percent. The PI includes the full information of the blood group findings. In addition to that, using the suggested standardization based on the probabilities of error according to Schulte Mönting and Walter, the test volume is also taken into account. The interpretation of the mathematical result is given by verbal predicates, the limitations of which are dependent on the verbal predicates for the probabilities of error according to Schulte Mönting and Walter, published by us previously. Besides the essential fact that the test volume is taken into account, the most important advantage of this procedure is that the mathematical result is involved in the court decision only by the PI (which is free of any valuation) and its verbal predicate and not by sometimes relatively high percentages, which may be misunderstood by laymen.
本文提出并解释了一种标准化的索引亲权指数（PI），用于在亲权纠纷案件中对血型检测结果进行统计评估。以PI X/Y作为参数，无需给出亲权概率的百分比。PI包含了血型检测结果的全部信息。此外，根据舒尔特·蒙廷和沃尔特提出的误差概率进行标准化，还考虑了检测量。数学结果的解释由语言谓词给出，其局限性取决于我们之前发表的舒尔特·蒙廷和沃尔特提出的误差概率的语言谓词。除了考虑检测量这一基本事实外，该方法最重要的优点是，数学结果仅通过PI（无任何估值）及其语言谓词参与法庭判决，而不是有时可能被外行误解的相对较高的百分比。
