• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Long-term prognosis in patients with bundle branch block complicating acute anteroseptal infarction.

作者信息

Hauer R N, Lie K I, Liem K L, Durrer D

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1982 May;49(7):1581-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90231-4.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(82)90231-4
PMID:7081047
Abstract

In a previous study patients with bundle branch block complications acute anteroseptal infarction found to have a high incidence rate of sudden death and late ventricular fibrillation in the first 6 weeks after infarction. Forty-two such consecutive patients were therefore kept within the monitoring area during those 6 weeks. Eighteen (43 percent) of these 42 patients survived and were then followed up for an average of 13 months to assess long-term prognosis and to evaluate whether the in-hospital monitoring period should be extended over 6 weeks. In most of these 18 patients a bifascicular block developed in the acute stage of infarction and in 3 it progressed to transient high degree atrioventricular (A-V) block. Seven of the 18 survivors had potentially lethal complications during the first 6 weeks. Four of these seven underwent aneurysmectomy between 10 and 20 weeks after infarction, and one of them died of a surgical complication. Major cardiac events occurred in 3 of the 17 survivors. None of these patients died during the follow-up period. In one patient complete A-V block developed after aneurysm resection; this was the only patient treated with permanent pacing. Fifteen of the 17 patients were in functional class I or II. These results indicate that (1) patients with bundle branch block complicating acute anteroseptal infarction who survive the first 6 weeks after infarction have a good prognosis during the 1st year, and (2) extension of the in-hospital monitoring period is not necessary. The results further suggest that prophylactic permanent pacing does not affect prognosis in these patients.

摘要

相似文献

1
Long-term prognosis in patients with bundle branch block complicating acute anteroseptal infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 1982 May;49(7):1581-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90231-4.
2
The clinical significance of bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. 2. Indications for temporary and permanent pacemaker insertion.束支传导阻滞合并急性心肌梗死的临床意义。2. 临时和永久起搏器植入的指征。
Circulation. 1978 Oct;58(4):689-99. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.58.4.689.
3
Long-term prognosis of patients with incomplete bilateral bundle branch block complicating acute myocardial infarction. Role of cardiac pacing.急性心肌梗死合并不完全性双侧束支传导阻滞患者的长期预后。心脏起搏的作用。
Am J Cardiol. 1974 Jul;34(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90084-8.
4
Frequency and prognostic implications of conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy.自溶栓治疗引入以来急性心肌梗死传导缺陷的发生率及其预后意义
Eur Heart J. 1998 Jun;19(6):893-8. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1997.0857.
5
The role of arrhythmia and left ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction and bundle branch block.心律失常和左心室功能障碍在急性心肌梗死合并束支传导阻滞患者中的作用。
Jpn Heart J. 1993 Mar;34(2):145-57. doi: 10.1536/ihj.34.145.
6
Right bundle branch block of unknown age in the setting of acute anterior myocardial infarction: an attempt to define who should be paced prophylactically.急性前壁心肌梗死背景下不明病程的右束支传导阻滞:关于确定谁应接受预防性起搏的尝试。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Aug;18(8):1496-508. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb06736.x.
7
Permanent pacing in patients with transient trifascicular block during acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死期间短暂性三分支阻滞患者的永久性起搏
Am J Cardiol. 1976 Aug;38(2):205-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90151-x.
8
Bundle branch blocks and/or hemiblocks complicating acute myocardial ischemia or infarction.束支传导阻滞和/或分支阻滞并发急性心肌缺血或梗死。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Aug;52(3):287-292. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0430-3. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
9
The clinical features and significance of bifascicular block complicating acute myocardial infarction.双分支阻滞合并急性心肌梗死的临床特征及意义
Eur J Cardiol. 1975 Dec;3(4):289-96.
10
The significance and prognosis of chronic bifascicular block.慢性双分支阻滞的意义及预后
Chest. 1977 Mar;71(3):329-34. doi: 10.1378/chest.71.3.329.

引用本文的文献

1
Dual-chamber versus single chamber pacemakers, a systemic review and meta-analysis on sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block patients.双腔起搏器与单腔起搏器治疗病态窦房结综合征和房室传导阻滞患者的系统评价与荟萃分析
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 18;10(1):e23877. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23877. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
2
Dysrhythmias in acute myocardial infarction: how to treat, when to treat, and when not to treat.急性心肌梗死中的心律失常:如何治疗、何时治疗以及何时不进行治疗。
Tex Heart Inst J. 1992;19(2):134-41.
3
Prognostic significance of bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction: the importance of location and time of appearance.
束支传导阻滞在急性心肌梗死中的预后意义:出现部位和时间的重要性
Clin Cardiol. 2001 May;24(5):371-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240505.
4
Pacemaker dependence in patients with bifascicular block during acute anterior myocardial infarction.急性前壁心肌梗死期间双分支阻滞患者的起搏器依赖
Br Heart J. 1984 Oct;52(4):408-12. doi: 10.1136/hrt.52.4.408.
5
Survival in second degree atrioventricular block.二度房室传导阻滞的生存率
Br Heart J. 1985 Jun;53(6):587-93. doi: 10.1136/hrt.53.6.587.
6
Assessment of the risk-benefit ratio for antiarrhythmic drug use.
Drugs. 1988 Nov;36(5):616-32. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198836050-00005.