Cooper J B, Long C D, Newbower R S, Philip J H
Anesthesiology. 1982 Jun;56(6):456-61. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198206000-00010.
It is a common practice for anesthesia to substitute for one another, especially for short breaks during long surgical procedures. The assets and liabilities of this practice of relief have not been examined previously. In the course of gathering 1,089 reports of preventable errors and failures associated with anesthesia management, we identified 96 which involved a relief anesthetist. This subset was examined in search of common characteristics and patterns of cause and discovery of errors. In 28 incidents, the relief anesthetist discovered an error or the cause of an error. In 10 incidents, the process of relief was identified as having contributed to the commission of an error. Although 70 of the 1,089 incidents were associated with substantive negative outcomes, e.g., death, cardiac arrest, or extended ICU stay, none of those incidents was caused by a relieving anesthetist. There is a strong implication that relief is beneficial more often than not even aside from the presumed beneficial effect on the vigilance of the primary anesthetist (the latter effect was outside the scope of this study). From the descriptions of the causes and discoveries of errors in these relief-related incidents, guidance can be drawn for the safe and effective conduct of the intraoperative exchange of anesthesia personnel.
麻醉人员相互替代是一种常见做法,尤其是在长时间手术过程中的短暂休息期间。此前尚未对这种替代做法的利弊进行过研究。在收集1089份与麻醉管理相关的可预防错误和失误报告的过程中,我们识别出96份涉及替代麻醉医生的报告。对这一子集进行了研究,以寻找常见特征以及错误的原因和发现模式。在28起事件中,替代麻醉医生发现了错误或错误原因。在10起事件中,替代过程被认定促成了错误的发生。尽管1089起事件中有70起与实质性负面结果相关,如死亡、心脏骤停或重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间延长,但这些事件均非由替代麻醉医生导致。这强烈表明,即使撇开对主麻醉医生警觉性的假定有益影响(后者的影响不在本研究范围内)不谈,替代通常也是有益的。从这些与替代相关事件中错误的原因和发现的描述中,可以得出关于麻醉人员术中安全有效交接的指导意见。