Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Emergency department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France.
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):812-819. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0607.
Emergency departments (ED) are environments that are at high risk for medical errors. Previous studies suggested that the proportion of medical errors may decrease when more than 1 physician is involved.
To reduce the proportion of medical errors by implementing systematic cross-checking between emergency physicians.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster randomized crossover trial includes a random sample of 14 adult patients (age ≥18 years) per day during two 10-day period in 6 EDs (n = 1680 patients) in France.
Systematic cross-checking between emergency physicians, 3 times a day, which included a brief presentation of one physician's case to another, followed by the second physician's feedback to the first.
Medical error in the ED, defined as an adverse event (either a near miss or a serious adverse event). The primary end point was identified using a 2-level error detection surveillance system, blinded to the strategy allocation.
Among the 1680 included patients (mean [SD] age, 57.5 [21.7] years), 144 (8.6%) had an adverse event. There were 54 adverse events among 840 patients (6.4%) in the cross-check group compared with 90 adverse events among 840 patients (10.7%) in the standard care group (relative risk reduction [RRR], 40% [95% CI, 12% to 59%]; absolute risk reduction [ARR], 4.3%; number needed to treat [NNT], 24). There was also a significant reduction rate of near misses (RRR, 47% [95% CI, 15% to 67%]; ARR, 2.7%; NNT, 37) but not of the rate of preventable serious adverse events (RRR, 29% [95% CI, -18% to 57%]; ARR, 1.2%; NNT, 83).
The implementation of systematic cross-checking between emergency physicians was associated with a significant reduction in adverse events, mainly driven by a reduction in near misses.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02356926.
急诊部(ED)是医疗失误风险较高的环境。先前的研究表明,当涉及多名医生时,医疗失误的比例可能会降低。
通过在急诊医生之间实施系统的交叉核对来降低医疗失误的比例。
设计、地点和参与者:这项集群随机交叉试验包括法国 6 家急诊部(ED)在两个 10 天期间每天随机抽取的 14 名成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)(n=1680 名患者)。
急诊医生之间每天进行 3 次系统的交叉核对,包括一名医生简要介绍另一名医生的病例,然后第二名医生向第一名医生反馈。
ED 中的医疗失误,定义为不良事件(包括接近失误或严重不良事件)。主要终点使用 2 级错误检测监测系统确定,对策略分配设盲。
在纳入的 1680 名患者中(平均[标准差]年龄,57.5[21.7]岁),有 144 名(8.6%)发生了不良事件。交叉核对组中有 840 名患者(6.4%)发生 54 例不良事件,而标准护理组中有 840 名患者(10.7%)发生 90 例不良事件(相对风险降低[RRR],40%[95%CI,12%至 59%];绝对风险降低[ARR],4.3%;需要治疗的人数[NNT],24)。接近失误的发生率也显著降低(RRR,47%[95%CI,15%至 67%];ARR,2.7%;NNT,37),但可预防的严重不良事件发生率并未降低(RRR,29%[95%CI,-18%至 57%];ARR,1.2%;NNT,83)。
在急诊医生之间实施系统的交叉核对与不良事件的显著减少相关,主要是由于接近失误的减少。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02356926。