• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns.

作者信息

Dubno J R, Dirks D D, Langhofer L R

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar;25(1):141-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2501.141.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2501.141
PMID:7087417
Abstract

Syllable recognition ability and consonant confusion patterns were evaluated for 38 listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss using the closed-set Nonsense-Syllable Test (NST). Performance for these materials varies as a function of consonant voicing, the position of the consonant in the syllable, and the accompanying vowel. Scores for listeners with steeply sloping audiometric configurations were consistently poorer than those for listeners with gradually sloping or flat audiograms. Consonant confusion analyses revealed place of articulation errors to be the most frequent, regardless of the listener's audiometric configuration. Analysis of consonant confusion patterns indicates the existence of a systematic relationship between consonant confusions and audiometric configuration. The NST findings are discussed in terms of the test's potential use and are compared to the results of existing confusion analyses.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns.
J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar;25(1):141-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2501.141.
2
Consonant recognition and confusion patterns among elderly hearing-impaired subjects.老年听力受损受试者的辅音识别与混淆模式。
Ear Hear. 1987 Oct;8(5):270-6. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198710000-00003.
3
A comparison of the effects of filtering and sensorineural hearing loss on patients of consonant confusions.
J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Mar;21(1):5-36. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2101.05.
4
Consonant-recognition patterns and self-assessment of hearing handicap.
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Dec;34(6):1397-409. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3406.1397.
5
Features from normal and sensorineural listeners' nonsense syllable test errors.正常听力者和感音神经性听力损失者无意义音节测试错误的特征。
Ear Hear. 1981 May-Jun;2(3):117-21. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198105000-00006.
6
Effects of acoustic modification on consonant recognition by elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Apr;81(4):1199-202. doi: 10.1121/1.394643.
7
Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.听力受损听众对经过时间处理的语音的感知。
Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):512-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc1fe.
8
Perceptual features from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children's errors on the NST.正常听力儿童和听力受损儿童在非言语智力测验(NST)上的错误所呈现的感知特征。
Ear Hear. 1986 Oct;7(5):318-22. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198610000-00005.
9
Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-Syllable Test. I. Test reliability.使用无意义音节测试对听力受损听众进行评估。I. 测试可靠性。
J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar;25(1):135-41. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2501.135.
10
[Speech audiometry with logatomes].[使用言语单位的言语测听法]
Laryngorhinootologie. 1997 Feb;76(2):57-64. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997389.

引用本文的文献

1
Effortful Listening Despite Correct Responses: The Cost of Mental Repair in Sentence Recognition by Listeners With Cochlear Implants.努力倾听,即使回答正确:人工耳蜗使用者在句子识别中的心理修复成本。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Oct 17;65(10):3966-3980. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00631. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
2
Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.语音和语义相似性对背景噪声中听错词的影响:句子语境、年龄和听力损失的作用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Jan;151(1):650. doi: 10.1121/10.0009367.
3
Distorted Tonotopy Severely Degrades Neural Representations of Connected Speech in Noise following Acoustic Trauma.
声创伤后,扭曲的音调拓扑严重降低了语音连接在噪声中的神经表示。
J Neurosci. 2022 Feb 23;42(8):1477-1490. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1268-21.2021. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
4
Animal models of hidden hearing loss: Does auditory-nerve-fiber loss cause real-world listening difficulties?隐藏性听力损失的动物模型:听神经纤维损失是否会导致现实世界中的听力困难?
Mol Cell Neurosci. 2022 Jan;118:103692. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2021.103692. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
5
Listening Effort Is Not the Same as Speech Intelligibility Score.听力努力程度与言语可懂度评分不同。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211027688. doi: 10.1177/23312165211027688.
6
High-Frequency Sensorineural Hearing Loss Alters Cue-Weighting Strategies for Discriminating Stop Consonants in Noise.高频传感器神经性听力损失改变了在噪声中辨别塞音的线索加权策略。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519886707. doi: 10.1177/2331216519886707.
7
Divergent Auditory Nerve Encoding Deficits Between Two Common Etiologies of Sensorineural Hearing Loss.两种常见感音神经性听力损失病因的听觉神经编码差异。
J Neurosci. 2019 Aug 28;39(35):6879-6887. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0038-19.2019. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.感音神经性听力损失对语音异步瞥见的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0154920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154920. eCollection 2016.
9
Reference-Free Assessment of Speech Intelligibility Using Bispectrum of an Auditory Neurogram.基于听觉神经图双谱估计的免参考语音可懂度评估
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 11;11(3):e0150415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150415. eCollection 2016.
10
Distorted Tonotopic Coding of Temporal Envelope and Fine Structure with Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.噪声性听力损失导致的颞部包络和精细结构的音调定位编码失真
J Neurosci. 2016 Feb 17;36(7):2227-37. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3944-15.2016.