LaSalle A J, Brewster D C, Corson J D, Darling R C
Surgery. 1982 Jul;92(1):36-9.
Controversy continues regarding the best arterial substitute for femoropopliteal reconstruction if an adequate length of autogenous saphenous vein is not available. To evaluate the role of composite grafts as an alternate vascular conduit, we have analyzed our experience with 39 femoropopliteal composite grafts as compared with a similar group of 79 below-knee prosthetic reconstructions. The 5-year cumulative patency rates for composite and prosthetic reconstructions to the distal popliteal artery were not statistically different (38 +/- 9% and 31 +/- 8%, respectively). The amount of vein relative to prosthesis did not appear to influence late patency. Both alternate reconstructive methods were significantly inferior to the 73 +/- 3% 5-year patency rate of autogenous vein bypass grafts. Based on this experience, we have abandoned the use of composite grafts for primary femoropopliteal reconstruction, since currently available prosthetic grafts appear to have similar long-term function.
如果没有足够长度的自体大隐静脉,对于股腘动脉重建的最佳动脉替代物仍存在争议。为了评估复合移植物作为替代血管管道的作用,我们分析了39例股腘动脉复合移植物的经验,并与79例类似的膝下人工血管重建病例组进行了比较。复合移植物和人工血管重建至腘动脉远端的5年累积通畅率无统计学差异(分别为38±9%和31±8%)。静脉与人工血管的比例似乎不影响远期通畅率。两种替代重建方法均明显低于自体静脉旁路移植术73±3%的5年通畅率。基于这一经验,我们已不再将复合移植物用于原发性股腘动脉重建,因为目前可用的人工血管移植物似乎具有相似的长期功能。