Patel D A, Flaherty E G, Dunn J
Am J Dis Child. 1982 Jul;136(7):634-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1982.03970430066019.
In 1975, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) stated that there is "no medical indication for routine circumcision of the newborn." A survey was conducted among Chicago-area pediatricians, obstetricians, and family practitioners to determine what impact this statement had on their approach to circumcision. Hospitals were also surveyed to determine whether the AAP's statement had caused a change in the frequency of circumcision in area hospitals. Only 49% of the physicians were aware of the AAP's position. Forty-one percent recommended routine circumcision; 15% recommended against the practice. Age, medical specialty, religious customs, and concerns about hygiene and cancer all appeared to influence the physicians' approach to circumcision. The frequency of routine circumcision. The frequency of routine circumcision was 70% to 90% and remained unchanged in the three years following the AAP's statement.
1975年,美国儿科学会(AAP)指出,“新生儿常规包皮环切术没有医学指征”。对芝加哥地区的儿科医生、产科医生和家庭医生进行了一项调查,以确定这一声明对他们进行包皮环切术的方法有何影响。还对医院进行了调查,以确定美国儿科学会的声明是否导致该地区医院包皮环切术的频率发生了变化。只有49%的医生知道美国儿科学会的立场。41%的人建议进行常规包皮环切术;15%的人反对这种做法。年龄、医学专业、宗教习俗以及对卫生和癌症的担忧似乎都影响了医生进行包皮环切术的方法。常规包皮环切术的频率。常规包皮环切术的频率为70%至90%,在美国儿科学会发表声明后的三年里保持不变。