• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

包皮环切术决策:社会关注的突出问题。

Circumcision decision: prominence of social concerns.

作者信息

Brown M S, Brown C A

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1987 Aug;80(2):215-9.

PMID:3615091
Abstract

Despite policy statements against routine circumcision of newborns by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology more than 10 years ago, there has been virtually no change in circumcision practices in the United States. In addition, controlled trials of programs to educate parents about the lack of medical indications for routine newborn circumcision have shown that parental education has little impact on the circumcision decision. We hypothesized that parents based their circumcision decision predominantly on social concerns rather than on medical ones. We prospectively surveyed parents of 124 newborns soon after they made the circumcision decision to learn their reasons for the decision. The strongest factor associated with the circumcision decision was whether or not the father was circumcised (P less than .0001). The survey also showed that concerns about the attitudes of peers and their sons' self concept in the future were prominent among parents deciding to circumcise. The circumcision decision in the United States is emerging as a cultural ritual rather than the result of medical misunderstanding among parents. In counseling parents making the circumcision decision, the health care provider should provide a knowledgeable and honest discussion of the medical aspects of circumcision. Until information is available that addresses parents' social concerns about circumcision, it is unreasonable to expect a significant change in circumcision customs in the United States.

摘要

尽管十多年前美国儿科学会和美国妇产科学会就发表了反对对新生儿进行常规包皮环切术的政策声明,但美国的包皮环切术实施情况几乎没有变化。此外,关于向父母宣传常规新生儿包皮环切术缺乏医学指征的项目的对照试验表明,对父母的教育对包皮环切术决策影响甚微。我们推测,父母做出包皮环切术决策主要基于社会因素而非医学因素。我们在124名新生儿的父母做出包皮环切术决策后不久对他们进行了前瞻性调查,以了解他们做出该决策的原因。与包皮环切术决策关联最强的因素是父亲是否接受过包皮环切术(P小于0.0001)。调查还显示,在决定进行包皮环切术的父母中,对同龄人的态度以及儿子未来自我认知的担忧较为突出。在美国,包皮环切术决策正逐渐成为一种文化习俗,而非父母医学认知误解的结果。在为做出包皮环切术决策的父母提供咨询时,医疗服务提供者应就包皮环切术的医学方面进行有见地且诚实的讨论。在有信息能够解决父母对包皮环切术的社会担忧之前,期望美国的包皮环切术习俗发生重大改变是不合理的。

相似文献

1
Circumcision decision: prominence of social concerns.包皮环切术决策:社会关注的突出问题。
Pediatrics. 1987 Aug;80(2):215-9.
2
Routine neonatal circumcision: the gap between contemporary policy and practice.常规新生儿包皮环切术:当代政策与实践之间的差距。
J Fam Pract. 1982 Jul;15(1):47-53.
3
Newborn circumcision in Victoria, Australia: reasons and parental attitudes.澳大利亚维多利亚州的新生儿包皮环切术:原因及家长态度
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Nov;78(11):1019-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04723.x.
4
Effect of parental education on decision-making about neonatal circumcision.父母教育程度对新生儿包皮环切术决策的影响。
South Med J. 2002 Apr;95(4):457-61.
5
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
6
Male circumcision.男性割礼。
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):e756-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1990. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
7
American Academy of Pediatrics releases new circumcision policy.美国儿科学会发布了新的包皮环切术政策。
AIDS Wkly Plus. 1999 Mar 22:13.
8
Neonatal circumcision: when is the decision made?新生儿包皮环切术:何时做出决定?
J Fam Pract. 1984 Jun;18(6):883-7.
9
Boldt v. Boldt: A pediatric ethics perspective.博尔特诉博尔特案:儿科伦理学视角
J Clin Ethics. 2009 Fall;20(3):251-7.
10
Psychosocial factors influence parental decision for circumcision in pediatric males of African American descent.社会心理因素影响非裔美国裔儿科男性患儿父母关于包皮环切术的决定。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2009 Apr;101(4):325-30. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30879-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of neonatal circumcision by pregnant women in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省孕妇对新生儿包皮环切术的接受度
Curationis. 2015 Mar 30;38(1):1433. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v38i1.1433.
2
Attitudes and decision making about neonatal male circumcision in a Hispanic population in New York City.纽约市西班牙裔人群对新生儿男性包皮环切术的态度及决策
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012 Oct;51(10):956-63. doi: 10.1177/0009922812441662. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
3
A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors.
与现状的契约?男性包皮环切术与英国医学协会给医生的新指南
J Med Ethics. 2005 Aug;31(8):463-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2004.009340.
4
Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty.价值判断、伤害与宗教自由。
J Med Ethics. 2004 Jun;30(3):241-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.003921.
5
Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks.男性包皮环切术:健康益处与风险评估
Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Oct;74(5):368-73. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.5.368.
6
Neonatal male circumcision after delisting in Ontario. Survey of new parents.安大略省退出医保覆盖范围后新生儿男性包皮环切术。对新生儿父母的调查。
Can Fam Physician. 1997 Jul;43:1241-7.
7
Circumcision without tears.无痛包皮环切术。
CMAJ. 1996 Sep 1;155(5):507-8; author reply 508-9.
8
Neonatal circumcision revisited. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society.重新审视新生儿包皮环切术。加拿大儿科学会胎儿与新生儿委员会。
CMAJ. 1996 Mar 15;154(6):769-80.
9
Management of foreskin problems.包皮问题的处理
Arch Dis Child. 1991 Jun;66(6):696-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.6.696.