Brockington I F, Helzer J E, Hillier V F, Francis A F
Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Aug;139(8):1022-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.8.1022.
Using patient samples in London hospitals, the authors compared three methods of diagnosing and subdividing depressive illness in terms of their ability to predict outcome. The Catego class D+ selected patients who continued to suffer from episodes of psychotic depression. The Research Diagnostic Criteria selected patients with schizoaffective depressions whose outcome a completely different from that of major depressive disorder. DSM-III had advantages over the other systems, since it divides depression into three subtypes that differ from each other and from schizophrenia. Patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of mood-incongruent psychotic depression had persistent schizophrenic psychopathology, but their outcome differed from that of both schizophrenic and manic-depressive patients.
作者利用伦敦医院的患者样本,比较了三种诊断和细分抑郁症的方法在预测结果方面的能力。Catego分类法中的D+类选择了持续患有精神病性抑郁症发作的患者。研究诊断标准选择了精神分裂症伴情感障碍性抑郁症患者,其结果与重度抑郁症完全不同。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)比其他系统更具优势,因为它将抑郁症分为三种彼此不同且与精神分裂症不同的亚型。被DSM-III诊断为心境不和谐的精神病性抑郁症患者存在持续性精神分裂症性精神病理学表现,但其结果与精神分裂症患者和双相情感障碍患者均不同。