• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)中分裂情感性障碍抑郁型的家族研究,与精神分裂症、精神病性及非精神病性重度抑郁症的比较。

A family study of DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, compared with schizophrenia and psychotic and nonpsychotic major depression.

作者信息

Maj M, Starace F, Pirozzi R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, First Medical School, University of Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1991 May;148(5):612-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.5.612.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.148.5.612
PMID:2018162
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity of DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder, the authors explored the morbid risks for schizophrenia and major affective disorders in the first-degree relatives of patients with schizoaffective disorder and relevant other diagnoses.

METHOD

In addition to patients with DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder, depressive type (N = 21), the probands included patients with mood-incongruent psychotic depression (N = 22), mood-congruent psychotic depression (N = 19), nonpsychotic depression (N = 27), or schizophrenia (N = 28) and normal subjects (N = 18). The patients were consecutively recruited from the outpatient facilities of a university psychiatry department; the normal subjects were students and nurses. All probands were directly interviewed, with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia--Lifetime Version (SADS-L), by a psychiatrist blind to information about relatives. Consenting relatives were directly interviewed, with the SADS-L, by two psychiatrists blind to the probands' diagnoses. The direct interview was supplemented--or replaced, when an interview was not possible (24%)--by family history data from all available sources. Morbid risks in relatives were calculated according to the Weinberg method.

RESULTS

The relatives of the schizoaffective patients had almost the same risk for schizophrenia as the relatives of the schizophrenic patients. In the relatives of the patients mood-incongruent psychotic depression, the morbid risk for major affective disorders was about one-half that of the relatives of the patients with mood-congruent psychotic depression and one-third that of the relatives of the patients with nonpsychotic depression, but these differences did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder is close to schizophrenia and largely corresponds to mainly schizophrenic schizoaffective disorder in the Research Diagnostic Criteria, whereas DSM-III-R mood-incongruent psychotic depression is probably quite heterogeneous and should be studied further.

摘要

目的

为评估《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM - III - R)精神分裂症性情感障碍的效度,作者探讨了精神分裂症性情感障碍患者及相关其他诊断患者的一级亲属患精神分裂症和重性情感障碍的患病风险。

方法

除了DSM - III - R精神分裂症性情感障碍(抑郁型,N = 21)患者外,先证者还包括情绪不协调的精神病性抑郁症患者(N = 22)、情绪协调的精神病性抑郁症患者(N = 19)、非精神病性抑郁症患者(N = 27)或精神分裂症患者(N = 28)以及正常受试者(N = 18)。患者是从一所大学精神科门诊连续招募的;正常受试者为学生和护士。所有先证者均由一位对亲属信息不知情的精神科医生使用《情感障碍与精神分裂症问卷——终身版》(SADS - L)进行直接访谈。同意参与的亲属由两位对先证者诊断不知情的精神科医生使用SADS - L进行直接访谈。当无法进行访谈时(24%),直接访谈由所有可用来源的家族史数据补充(或替代)。亲属的患病风险根据温伯格方法计算。

结果

精神分裂症性情感障碍患者的亲属患精神分裂症的风险与精神分裂症患者的亲属几乎相同。在情绪不协调的精神病性抑郁症患者的亲属中,患重性情感障碍的患病风险约为情绪协调的精神病性抑郁症患者亲属的一半,是非精神病性抑郁症患者亲属的三分之一,但这些差异未达到统计学意义。

结论

这些结果表明,DSM - III - R精神分裂症性情感障碍与精神分裂症相近,在很大程度上对应于《研究诊断标准》中主要为精神分裂症的精神分裂症性情感障碍,而DSM - III - R情绪不协调的精神病性抑郁症可能相当异质,应进一步研究。

相似文献

1
A family study of DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, compared with schizophrenia and psychotic and nonpsychotic major depression.一项关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)中分裂情感性障碍抑郁型的家族研究,与精神分裂症、精神病性及非精神病性重度抑郁症的比较。
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 May;148(5):612-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.5.612.
2
Schizoaffective disorder and affective disorders with mood-incongruent psychotic features: keep separate or combine? Evidence from a family study.精神分裂症伴情感障碍及具有心境不协调精神病性特征的情感障碍:分开还是合并?来自一项家系研究的证据。
Am J Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;149(12):1666-73. doi: 10.1176/ajp.149.12.1666.
3
Examining the validity of DSM-III-R schizoaffective disorder and its putative subtypes in the Roscommon Family Study.在罗斯康芒家族研究中检验《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)精神分裂症性情感障碍及其假定亚型的有效性。
Am J Psychiatry. 1995 May;152(5):755-64. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.5.755.
4
An 8-year follow-up of patients with DSM-III-R psychotic depression, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophrenia.对患有DSM-III-R型精神病性抑郁症、分裂情感性障碍和精神分裂症患者的8年随访。
Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Aug;150(8):1182-8. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.8.1182.
5
Schizoaffective disorder: a form of schizophrenia or affective disorder?分裂情感性障碍:精神分裂症的一种形式还是情感障碍?
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;60(12):874-82.
6
The Roscommon Family Study. I. Methods, diagnosis of probands, and risk of schizophrenia in relatives.罗斯康芒家族研究。I. 方法、先证者的诊断以及亲属患精神分裂症的风险。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;50(7):527-40. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820190029004.
7
A DSM-III family study of the nonschizophrenic psychotic disorders.一项关于非精神分裂症性精神障碍的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版家族研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Sep;143(9):1098-105. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.9.1098.
8
Psychiatric morbidity in the relatives of patients with DSM-III schizophreniform disorder: comparisons with the relatives of schizophrenic and bipolar disorder patients.DSM-III 精神分裂症样障碍患者亲属中的精神疾病发病率:与精神分裂症和双相情感障碍患者亲属的比较。
J Psychiatr Res. 1991;25(1-2):19-29. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(91)90013-z.
9
The Roscommon Family Study. IV. Affective illness, anxiety disorders, and alcoholism in relatives.罗斯康芒家族研究。IV. 亲属中的情感性疾病、焦虑症和酗酒问题。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Dec;50(12):952-60. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240036005.
10
Continuity and discontinuity of affective disorders and schizophrenia. Results of a controlled family study.情感障碍与精神分裂症的连续性和非连续性:一项对照家庭研究的结果
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;50(11):871-83. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820230041004.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiles of Genetic Risks for Psychotic Disorders.精神障碍的遗传风险概况。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.1289.
2
Familial risk of psychosis in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Impact on clinical characteristics, comorbidity and treatment response.强迫症患者精神病家族风险:对临床特征、共病和治疗反应的影响。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Dec;156:557-563. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
3
The effects of age and sex on cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: Findings from the Consortium on the Genetics of Schizophrenia (COGS) study.
年龄和性别对精神分裂症认知障碍的影响:来自精神分裂症遗传学联合会(COGS)研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 May 13;15(5):e0232855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232855. eCollection 2020.
4
Relationship between neuropsychological behavior and brain white matter in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病患者的神经心理学行为与脑白质的关系。
Schizophr Res. 2019 Jun;208:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
5
Rating scales measuring the severity of psychotic depression.评估精神病性抑郁严重程度的评定量表。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 Nov;132(5):335-44. doi: 10.1111/acps.12449. Epub 2015 May 27.
6
A twin study of schizoaffective-mania, schizoaffective-depression, and other psychotic syndromes.双生子研究精神分裂情感性躁狂症、精神分裂情感性抑郁症和其他精神病综合征。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2012 Mar;159B(2):172-82. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32011. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
7
Bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: not so distant relatives?双相情感障碍和精神分裂症:并非远亲?
World Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;2(2):68-72.
8
Bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: convergent molecular data.双相情感障碍与精神分裂症:趋同的分子数据
Neuromolecular Med. 2004;5(1):109-17. doi: 10.1385/NMM:5:1:109.
9
The New York High-Risk Project. Prevalence and comorbidity of axis I disorders in offspring of schizophrenic parents at 25-year follow-up.纽约高危项目。对精神分裂症患者父母的后代进行25年随访,观察轴I障碍的患病率及共病情况。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;54(12):1096-102. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830240052008.
10
The New York High-Risk Project. Psychoses and cluster A personality disorders in offspring of schizophrenic parents at 23 years of follow-up.纽约高危项目。对精神分裂症患者父母的后代进行23年随访,观察其精神病及A型人格障碍情况。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 Oct;52(10):857-65. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950220067013.