Reactivity versus flexibility in thiobacilli.

The results of ecophysiological studies on obligately and facultatively chemolithotrophic thiobacilli performed over the past years clearly show that the two types of organisms occupy different ecological niches. Chemostat experiments with cultures of the obligate chemolithotroph Thiobacillus neapolitanus and the facultative chemolithotroph Thiobacillus A2 have been carried out to explain the competitiveness of T. neapolitanus under conditions of strongly fluctuating substrate supply. Thiobacillus neapolitanus appeared to be very resistant to starvation periods whereafter it could oxidize sulfide (or thiosulfate) almost instantaneously at the original rate. Under alternate supply of 4 h sulfide and 4 h sulfate (or acetate which does not support growth of the organism either) to a chemostat culture of T. neapolitanus (D=0.05h-1) the sulfide concentration in the growth vessel never reached levels higher than 4 micrometers. This strategy is aimed at maximal reactivity. In contrast to T. neapolitanus the facultative chemolithotroph T.A2 appeared to be very flexible with respect to its energy generation. Under alternate supply of 4 h sulfide and 4 acetate (D=0.05h-1) T.A2 was able to grow continuously since it directed its metabolism to either heterotrophy or autotrophy by rapid induction-repression mechanisms. This flexible strategy seems to be incompatible with a reactive strategy within one organism, since the oxidation capacity for sulfide decreased during the acetate period resulting in accumulation of sulfide during the sulfide period. It is concluded that T.A2 needs a continuous supply of an inorganic and an organic substrate to thrive whereas T. neapolitanus needs only a continuous supply of a reduced inorganic sulfur source but also will persist in environments with interrupted addition of sulfide provided that the starvation period does not last too long.