Guglielmi R S, Roberts A H, Patterson R
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1982 Mar;7(1):99-120. doi: 10.1007/BF00999058.
The lack of control procedures inherent in most of the experiments conducted to assess the effectiveness of skin temperature biofeedback in the treatment of Raynaud's disease renders the results inconclusive. In this study, control groups and a double-blind approach are adopted. Thirty-six patients, carefully screened for a diagnosis of primary Raynaud's disease, were assigned to a skin temperature increase group (N = 12), to an EMG relaxation control group (N = 12), or to a notreatment control group (N = 12). All patients kept records of their symptoms for the duration of the study. Each subject in the two training groups received 20 sessions, the last 2 conducted under cold stress. data analysis according to original group assignment, as well as following regrouping of subjects according to several learning criteria, showed that while all patients reported a marked decrease in the number of vasospastic attacks, no significant differences were found among the three groups on the clinical measures used to assess symptomatic relief. The general improvement reported must therefore be attributed to nonspecific factors.
在大多数为评估皮肤温度生物反馈治疗雷诺氏病有效性而进行的实验中,由于缺乏内在的对照程序,使得结果尚无定论。在本研究中,采用了对照组和双盲方法。36名经仔细筛查确诊为原发性雷诺氏病的患者被分为皮肤温度升高组(N = 12)、肌电图放松对照组(N = 12)或非治疗对照组(N = 12)。所有患者在研究期间都记录了自己的症状。两个训练组中的每个受试者接受20次治疗,最后2次在冷应激下进行。根据原始分组以及根据几个学习标准对受试者重新分组后的数据分析表明,虽然所有患者报告血管痉挛发作次数显著减少,但在用于评估症状缓解的临床指标上,三组之间未发现显著差异。因此,报告的总体改善必须归因于非特异性因素。