de Beule R, Vannieuwenhuyse E, Callier J, Verstraete W, Degreef F, Gregoire M, Robience Y, Stevens W, Libert P
Acta Allergol. 1977 Aug;32(4):278-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1977.tb01359.x.
The efficacy of the new anti-allergic compound oxatimide was tested in a double-blind study against a placebo during the pollen season of 1976 in 215 patients (4 1/2--69 years) with hay fever. Adult patients were instructed to take two tablets (= 20 mg) three times a day for 2 weeks, children received one tablet/10 kg of body weight daily; in addition, they were given a supply of diphenhydramine as a potential supplement. Twelve patients, six from either group, were excluded from the analysis. A significantly higher proportion of patients from the active drug group (n = 104) experienced no or only a few days of complaints, i.e. rhinitis and conjunctivitis, as well as asthma-like complaints, as compared with those of the control group (n = 99). Also, diphenhydramine consumption became significantly lower in the active drug group from the second day onwards, whereas a gradual increase and continuous need were seen in the greater part of the control group. One week of treatment appears sufficient to judge whether the individual patient benefits from the drug or not.
1976年花粉季节期间,在一项双盲研究中,对215例(4.5至69岁)花粉热患者使用新型抗过敏化合物奥沙米特,并与安慰剂进行对照试验。成年患者被要求每日三次、每次两片(相当于20毫克),服用两周;儿童按每10千克体重每日一片服用;此外,还给他们提供了苯海拉明作为备用药物。分析时排除了12名患者,每组各6名。与对照组(n = 99)相比,活性药物组(n = 104)中经历无不适或仅有几天不适(即鼻炎、结膜炎以及类似哮喘的不适)的患者比例显著更高。而且,从第二天起,活性药物组的苯海拉明消耗量显著降低,而对照组大部分患者的消耗量则逐渐增加且持续有需求。一周的治疗似乎足以判断个体患者是否能从该药中获益。