Dent P B, McCulloch P B, Wesley-James O, MacLaren R, Muirhead W, Dunnett C W
Cancer. 1978 Sep;42(3 Suppl):1484-91. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197809)42:3+<1484::aid-cncr2820420819>3.0.co;2-j.
Estimation of CEA levels by the Z-gel method indicates that smokers, patients with limited lung cancer and patients with extensive lung cancer have higher values than nonsmoking controls. The CEA levels within each group are significantly different from one another. Use of CEA estimation for diagnostic purposes is limited because of the considerable overlap between normal controls and patients with cancer, the relatively low incidence of elevated values in patients with limited disease and the high incidence of false negatives (20%) even in patients with extensive disease. Elevated CEA values are associated with a poor prognosis and could be of clinical value as an addition to clinical staging to determine survival particularly for patients with extra-thoracic disease. Persistently high values in patients deemed clinically disease-free postoperatively are indicative of residual disease and a poor prognosis. If and when effective therapy for bronchogenic carcinoma becomes available, monitoring of CEA values may be useful in some patients as an early indication of release. Further studies are required to determine if the extraordinarily poor prognosis associated with marked elevations of CEA may be used as an additional criterion of inoperability in such patients.
采用Z凝胶法测定癌胚抗原(CEA)水平表明,吸烟者、局限性肺癌患者和广泛性肺癌患者的CEA值高于不吸烟的对照组。每组内的CEA水平彼此之间存在显著差异。由于正常对照组与癌症患者之间存在相当大的重叠、局限性疾病患者中CEA值升高的发生率相对较低以及即使是广泛性疾病患者中假阴性发生率也较高(20%),因此将CEA测定用于诊断目的受到限制。CEA值升高与预后不良相关,作为临床分期的补充以确定生存率,特别是对于胸外疾病患者,可能具有临床价值。术后被认为临床无病的患者中持续高值表明存在残留疾病且预后不良。如果并且当有了有效的支气管癌治疗方法时,监测CEA值在一些患者中可能有助于作为缓解的早期指标。需要进一步研究以确定与CEA显著升高相关的极差预后是否可作为此类患者不可手术的附加标准。