• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症的家庭治疗:背景与现状

Family treatments of schizophrenia: background and state of the art.

作者信息

Beels C C, McFarlane W R

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1982 Jul;33(7):541-50. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.7.541.

DOI:10.1176/ps.33.7.541
PMID:7106715
Abstract

Schizophrenia, as a failure to achieve maturity and independence, has always had distressing effects on a patient's family. Unfortunately, scientific theories that propose the family itself as a contributing factor have eroded the alliance between professionals and family members and added to the burden of family guilt. The initiative in designing family therapy for schizophrenia began among an early group of innovators who subscribed to strong family-theory ideologies. Today a more pragmatic group, trained in various research methodologies, has taken the lead. The authors discuss the historical development of family therapy for schizophrenia and review new programs including relatives' groups, psychoeducational family therapy, and strategic and systemic approaches.

摘要

精神分裂症,作为一种未能实现成熟与独立的病症,一直对患者家庭产生着令人痛苦的影响。不幸的是,那些将家庭本身视为一个促成因素的科学理论,破坏了专业人员与家庭成员之间的联盟,并加重了家庭的内疚负担。为精神分裂症设计家庭治疗的倡议始于早期一批秉持强烈家庭理论观念的创新者。如今,一个接受过各种研究方法培训的更加务实的群体已占据主导地位。作者们讨论了精神分裂症家庭治疗的历史发展,并回顾了新的项目,包括亲属团体、心理教育家庭治疗以及策略性和系统性方法。

相似文献

1
Family treatments of schizophrenia: background and state of the art.精神分裂症的家庭治疗:背景与现状
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1982 Jul;33(7):541-50. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.7.541.
2
A comparison of short-term psychoeducational and support groups for relatives coping with chronic schizophrenia.针对慢性精神分裂症患者亲属的短期心理教育与支持小组对比研究
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1990 Dec;4(6):343-53. doi: 10.1016/0883-9417(90)90024-f.
3
Using family psychoeducation when there is no family.在没有家人的情况下使用家庭心理教育。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1987 Mar;38(3):274-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.38.3.274.
4
[Therapeutic family counseling of schizophrenic patients: rational aspects, concept and practical guidelines].[精神分裂症患者的治疗性家庭咨询:理性层面、概念及实践指南]
Psychiatr Prax. 1987 May;14(3):73-7.
5
Comments on Terkelsen's "Schizophrenia and the Family: II. Adverse effects of family therapy".对特尔凯尔森《精神分裂症与家庭:II. 家庭治疗的不良影响》的评论
Fam Process. 1984 Sep;23(3):421-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00421.x.
6
[Family group in schizophrenic diseases. Overview, personal concept and report of experiences].[精神分裂症疾病中的家族群组。综述、个人观点及经验报告]
Psychiatr Prax. 1996 Sep;23(5):219-25.
7
[Psychoeducational family treatment in schizophrenia--a popular concept? A critical evaluation of different treatment models].[精神分裂症的心理教育家庭治疗——一个流行的概念?对不同治疗模式的批判性评估]
Psychiatr Prax. 1997 May;24(3):110-6.
8
A trial of family therapy versus a relatives' group for schizophrenia. Two-year follow-up.一项针对精神分裂症患者的家庭治疗与亲属小组治疗对比试验。两年随访。
Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Oct;157:571-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.4.571.
9
[Information-centered family groups for improving compliance in schizophrenic patients].以信息为中心的家庭小组改善精神分裂症患者的依从性
Psychiatr Prax. 1991 Mar;18(2):48-54.
10
Changes in patient coping style following individual and family treatment for schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者接受个体治疗和家庭治疗后应对方式的变化。
Br J Psychiatry. 1991 May;158:642-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.158.5.642.

引用本文的文献

1
The outpatient treatment of schizophrenia: an integrated and comprehensive management-oriented approach.精神分裂症的门诊治疗:一种以综合全面管理为导向的方法。
Psychiatr Q. 1984 Summer;56(2):91-112. doi: 10.1007/BF01064946.
2
A comprehensive treatment program for schizophrenia and chronic mental illness.针对精神分裂症和慢性精神疾病的综合治疗方案。
Community Ment Health J. 1986 Fall;22(3):175-89. doi: 10.1007/BF00756980.
3
Prognosis for schizophrenia in the Third World: a reevaluation of cross-cultural research.第三世界精神分裂症的预后:跨文化研究的重新评估
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1992 Mar;16(1):53-75; discussion 77-106. doi: 10.1007/BF00054439.