Mullner R, Andes S, Tatalovich R, Bardes B
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(11):1147-56. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90116-2.
This study examines the spatial patterns of congressional voting on health issues. Thirteen roll call votes on health care issues occurring during the 1st Session of the 96th Congress are factor analyzed. This analysis shows that health care questions cluster around two major issues: health care regulation and health care spending. The factor scores for each Representative are mapped, and a regression model is developed relating health care voting to characteristics of the Representative, the Congressional district, and the hospitals in that district. The most important findings were: (1) support for both health care spending and regulation is strongest in the Northeast and upper Midwest. (2) Although Representatives from most of the Southern states are opposed to health care regulation, they generally favor health care spending. (3) Representatives from a few of the Southern states, however, do not fit this generalization. (4) Although Representatives from the Pacific Coast states are the strongest proponents of regulation, they are opposed to spending (5) Opposition to health care spending is particularly strong among Representatives from suburban districts.
本研究考察了国会在医疗问题上的投票空间模式。对第96届国会第一会期期间发生的13次关于医疗保健问题的唱名表决进行了因子分析。该分析表明,医疗保健问题集中在两个主要问题上:医疗保健监管和医疗保健支出。绘制了每位众议员的因子得分,并建立了一个回归模型,将医疗保健投票与众议员、国会选区以及该选区医院的特征联系起来。最重要的发现是:(1)东北部和中西部上半区对医疗保健支出和监管的支持最为强烈。(2) 尽管大多数南方州的众议员反对医疗保健监管,但他们总体上支持医疗保健支出。(3) 然而,少数南方州的众议员并不符合这一普遍情况。(4) 尽管太平洋沿岸各州的众议员是监管的最有力支持者,但他们反对支出。(5) 郊区众议员对医疗保健支出的反对尤为强烈。