• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Do the American Medical Association's campaign contributions influence health care legislation?

作者信息

Keiser K R, Jones W

出版信息

Med Care. 1986 Aug;24(8):761-6. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198608000-00011.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-198608000-00011
PMID:3736146
Abstract

Despite the fact that ideology and party overshadow campaign contributions as determinants of congressional voting behavior, the thesis of this study is that the American Medical Association's contributions have an important policy impact. Their donations had a significant effect on an index of three votes in 1979 in the House of Representatives. The contributions of the AMA had more of an effect than did those of the AFL-CIO. The AMA's money was related to decision-making in the Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce Committees. While the medical lobby does not dominate health care policy, its power should not be underestimated.

摘要

相似文献

1
Do the American Medical Association's campaign contributions influence health care legislation?
Med Care. 1986 Aug;24(8):761-6. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198608000-00011.
2
Campaign contributions from the American Medical Political Action Committee to Members of Congress. For or against the public health?美国医学政治行动委员会对国会议员的竞选捐款。是支持还是反对公共卫生?
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jan 6;330(1):32-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199401063300107.
3
Money, politics, and medicine: the American Medical PAC's strategy of giving in U.S. house races.金钱、政治与医学:美国医学政治行动委员会在美国众议院竞选中的捐赠策略。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999 Apr;24(2):335-55. doi: 10.1215/03616878-24-2-335.
4
1996 congressional campaign priorities of the AMA: tackling tobacco or limiting malpractice awards?1996年美国医学协会的国会竞选优先事项:应对烟草问题还是限制医疗事故赔偿?
Am J Public Health. 1998 Aug;88(8):1233-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.8.1233.
5
An analysis of congressional health policy voting in the 1970s.对20世纪70年代国会卫生政策投票情况的分析。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Spring;11(1):117-35. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-1-117.
6
Epidemiology of failed tobacco control legislation.烟草控制立法失败的流行病学研究。
JAMA. 1994 Oct 19;272(15):1171-5.
7
An analysis of the American Medical Association's recommendations for change in the medical care sector of the United States.
Int J Health Serv. 1991;21(4):685-96. doi: 10.2190/N5UT-60CA-RAEE-ECCL.
8
Unhealthy money: the growth in health PACs' congressional campaign contributions.有害资金:健康政治行动委员会在国会竞选捐款中的增长情况。
Int J Health Serv. 1993;23(1):81-93. doi: 10.2190/JM8F-CJM1-N9ME-FLHX.
9
A spatial analysis of voting on health care issues. United States House of Representatives, 86th Congress, First Session.关于医疗保健问题投票的空间分析。美国众议院,第86届国会,第一次会议。
Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(11):1147-56. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90116-2.
10
Congressional voting behavior on hospital legislation: an exploratory study.国会对医院立法的投票行为:一项探索性研究。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1984 Winter;8(4):686-701. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8-4-686.