Herring J A, Wenger D R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982 May-Jun;7(3):285-98.
Two groups of patients with complex scoliosis problems are presented. The majority of patients had neurogenic scoliosis. Thirty patients (Group A) had Harrington instrumentation with segmental wiring and were immobilized postoperatively. Instrument stability was best when sacral fixation was not required. Pseudarthrosis was especially likely when there was deficiency of posterior elements. Ten patients (Group B) had double L rod instrumentation, and six had no postoperative immobilization. Correction was maintained except in two patients with kyphotic curves. There were transient neurologic complications in both groups, nerve root contusion being the most common (four cases). It is concluded that segmental instrumentation provides significant improvement in stability over conventional Harrington instrumentation. The advantages of added stability must be weighed against the increased potential for neurologic complications.
本文介绍了两组患有复杂脊柱侧凸问题的患者。大多数患者患有神经源性脊柱侧凸。30名患者(A组)采用哈灵顿器械加节段性钢丝固定,并在术后进行固定。当不需要骶骨固定时,器械稳定性最佳。当后部结构不足时,假关节形成的可能性尤其大。10名患者(B组)采用双L棒器械固定,6名患者术后未进行固定。除两名患有后凸畸形的患者外,矫正效果得以维持。两组均出现短暂性神经并发症,神经根挫伤最为常见(4例)。结论是,节段性器械固定在稳定性方面比传统的哈灵顿器械有显著改善。增加的稳定性优势必须与神经并发症潜在风险的增加相权衡。