Brown A H, Morritt G N, Hammo M
Thorax. 1982 Apr;37(4):275-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.37.4.275.
Myocardial damage incurred by ischaemia appears during and seems to be accelerated by reperfusion, which restores recoverable cells and disrupts badly damaged ones. Vicious cycles of oedema, calcium accumulation, acidosis, oxygen toxicity, fibrillation and air and platelet emboli contribute to the reperfusion injury. The philosophy of cool low-pressure reperfusion gradually restoring temperature and pressure to normal is here contrasted experimentally with that of immediate normothermic, normotensive perfusion after 90 minutes of ischaemic cool, cardioplegic arrest. The preparation was a canine heart which was treated according to the usual clinical protocol except that one group was reperfused at normal temperature and pressure, and the other group started reperfusion cool and at a low pressure and over the next 10 minutes pressure and temperature were restored to normal. Isovolumic ventricular function studies were done before ischaemia and after recovery and showed statistically significant differences between the groups in favour of the immediate restoration of normal temperature and pressure of perfusion. Contractile velocity and systolic pressure showed very highly significant (p = less than 0.005) differences, wall stress significant (p = less than 0.025) and compliance not significant differences between the groups. Reperfusion with optimal conditions may prevent "vicious cycle" changes in ischaemically damaged but recoverable myocardium. We have shown that a step in this direction is reperfusion with blood at normal temperature and pressure rather than initially at lowered temperature and pressure.
缺血引起的心肌损伤在再灌注期间出现,并且似乎因再灌注而加速,再灌注可恢复可恢复的细胞并破坏严重受损的细胞。水肿、钙积累、酸中毒、氧中毒、纤颤以及空气和血小板栓塞的恶性循环会导致再灌注损伤。在此,将逐渐将温度和压力恢复正常的低温低压再灌注理念与缺血性低温、心脏停搏90分钟后立即进行常温、常压灌注的理念进行了实验对比。实验对象是犬心脏,按照常规临床方案进行处理,只是一组在正常温度和压力下进行再灌注,另一组开始时低温、低压再灌注,在接下来的10分钟内将压力和温度恢复正常。在缺血前和恢复后进行了等容心室功能研究,结果显示两组之间存在统计学上的显著差异,支持立即恢复正常的灌注温度和压力。收缩速度和收缩压显示出两组之间非常高度显著(p < 0.005)的差异,壁应力显著(p < 0.025),而顺应性在两组之间无显著差异。在最佳条件下进行再灌注可能会防止缺血性损伤但可恢复的心肌出现“恶性循环”变化。我们已经表明,朝着这个方向迈出的一步是在正常温度和压力下用血液进行再灌注,而不是最初在低温和低压下进行。