Martin T G, Elenbaas R M, Pingleton S H
Ann Emerg Med. 1982 Sep;11(9):466-70. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(82)80063-2.
Our study evaluated the ability of early peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) to be predictive of hospital admission while double blinding the measurements and using a standardized treatment protocol and specific admission criteria. The measurements were recorded prior to and after initial therapy. Eighty-six acute asthmatic episodes in 51 patients were analyzed. Nine (10.5%) of the episodes resulted in hospitalization; 77 (89.5%) resulted in discharge. No correlation with admission was found for the initial PEFR, a second PEFR following treatment, or the differences between these two values. Our study indicates that early PEFRs alone are not useful predictors of the need for hospital admission. Although a significant number of patients in our study population presented with severe airflow obstruction, they responded sufficiently to treatment to permit discharge.
我们的研究评估了早期呼气峰值流速(PEFR)在双盲测量、使用标准化治疗方案和特定入院标准的情况下预测住院的能力。测量在初始治疗前后进行记录。对51例患者的86次急性哮喘发作进行了分析。其中9次发作(10.5%)导致住院;77次发作(89.5%)得以出院。未发现初始PEFR、治疗后的第二次PEFR或这两个值之间的差异与入院存在相关性。我们的研究表明,仅早期PEFR并不能有效预测是否需要住院。尽管我们研究人群中的大量患者存在严重气流阻塞,但他们对治疗反应良好,可以出院。