Puchtler H, Waldrop F W
Histochemistry. 1978 Sep 15;57(3):177-87. doi: 10.1007/BF00492078.
Maresch (1905) introduced Bielschowsky's silver impregnation technic for neurofibrils as a stain for reticulum fibers, but emphasized the nonspecificity of such procedures. This lack of specificity has been confirmed repeatedly. Yet, since the 1920's the definition of "reticulin" and studies of its distribution were based solely on silver impregnation technics. The chemical mechanism and specificity of this group of stains is obscure. Application of Gomori's and Wilder's methods to human tissues showed variations of staining patterns with the fixatives and technics employed. Besides reticulum fibers, various other tissue structures, e.g. I bands of striated muscle, fibers in nervous tissues, and model substances, e.g. polysaccharides, egg white, gliadin, were also stained. Deposition of silver compounds on reticulum fibers was limited to an easily removable substance; the remaining collagen component did not bind silver. These histochemical studies indicate that silver impregnation technics for reticulum fibers have no chemical significance and cannot be considered as histochemical technics for "reticulin" or type III collagen.
马雷施(1905年)将 Bielschowsky 用于神经原纤维的银浸染技术引入,作为网状纤维的一种染色方法,但强调了此类方法的非特异性。这种缺乏特异性的情况已被反复证实。然而,自20世纪20年代以来,“网状纤维蛋白”的定义及其分布的研究仅基于银浸染技术。这组染色剂的化学机制和特异性尚不清楚。将戈莫里氏法和怀尔德氏法应用于人体组织时,染色模式会因所使用的固定剂和技术而有所不同。除了网状纤维外,各种其他组织结构,如横纹肌的I带、神经组织中的纤维,以及模型物质,如多糖、蛋清、麦醇溶蛋白,也会被染色。银化合物在网状纤维上的沉积仅限于一种易于去除的物质;其余的胶原蛋白成分不结合银。这些组织化学研究表明,用于网状纤维的银浸染技术没有化学意义,不能被视为“网状纤维蛋白”或III型胶原蛋白的组织化学技术。