Suppr超能文献

绵羊十二指肠食糜中微生物氮估算方法的比较

A comparison of methods for the estimation of microbial nitrogen in duodenal digesta of sheep.

作者信息

Siddons R C, Beever D E, Nolan J V

出版信息

Br J Nutr. 1982 Sep;48(2):377-89. doi: 10.1079/bjn19820121.

Abstract
  1. Six sheep, each fitted with a rumen cannula and re-entrant cannulas in the proximal duodenum and distal ileum, were given two diets (600 g dry matter (DM)/d) consisting of either grass silage (32.1 g nitrogen/kg DM) or dried grass (18.3 g N/kg DM). A net loss of N occurred between mouth and duodenum with the silage diet, indicating extensive ruminal degradation of dietary N, compared with a net gain on the dried-grass diet. Consequently, despite higher N intakes when silage was given, N flow at the duodenum was similar for both diets. 2. The proportion of microbial N in duodenal digesta N was estimated using diaminopimelic acid (DAPA), [35S]methionine (35S), 15N-enriched non-ammonia-N (15NAN) and amino acid profiles (AAP) as microbial markers. Isotopic labelling of rumen micro-organisms was achieved by intraruminal infusions of Na2 35SO4 and (15NH4)2SO4. 3. A comparison of all methods was made based on the marker concentrations in microbial fractions isolated by differential centrifuagation of strained rumen contents. With both diets, DAPA gave the highest estimates and AAP the lowest. Estimates based on 35S and 15NAN were intermediate and did not differ significantly (P greater than 0.05). 4. For the 15NAN, 35S and AAP methods, the effect of site of sampling of the microbial fraction, i.e. from rumen contents or duodenal digesta, was examined and in all instances mean estimates based on duodenally-derived microbes were higher. However, the differences were significant for only 15NAN with both diets (P less than 0.001), for 35S with the dried grass (P less than 0.05), and for AAP with the silage (P less than 0.05). Estimates based on duodenally-derived microbes were higher (P less than 0.05) using 15 NAN than those obtained using 35S with both diets. 5. Depending on the method used for estimating microbial N, estimates of the efficiency of microbial N synthesis in the rumen (g microbial N flow at duodenum/kg organic matter apparently digested in the rumen) ranged between 16 and 38 for the silage diet and 10 and 46 for the dried grass diet. Similarly, estimates of feed N degradability in the rumen ranged between 0.62 and 0.97 for the silage and 0.00 and 0.93 for the dried grass.
摘要
  1. 六只绵羊,每只都安装有瘤胃瘘管以及十二指肠近端和回肠远端的再进入式瘘管,分别给予两种日粮(600克干物质/天),一种是青贮草(32.1克氮/千克干物质),另一种是干草(18.3克氮/千克干物质)。青贮日粮时,口腔至十二指肠间出现氮净损失,表明日粮氮在瘤胃中大量降解,而干草日粮时则出现氮净增加。因此,尽管给予青贮料时氮摄入量更高,但两种日粮在十二指肠处的氮流量相似。2. 使用二氨基庚二酸(DAPA)、[35S]蛋氨酸(35S)、15N标记的非氨氮(15NAN)和氨基酸谱(AAP)作为微生物标记物,估算十二指肠食糜氮中微生物氮的比例。通过向瘤胃内注入Na2 35SO4和(15NH4)2SO4实现瘤胃微生物的同位素标记。3. 根据通过对过滤后的瘤胃内容物进行差速离心分离出的微生物组分中的标记物浓度,对所有方法进行了比较。两种日粮情况下,DAPA得出的估算值最高,AAP得出的估算值最低。基于35S和15NAN的估算值居中且无显著差异(P大于0.05)。4. 对于15NAN、35S和AAP方法,研究了微生物组分采样部位(即瘤胃内容物或十二指肠食糜)的影响,所有情况下,基于十二指肠来源微生物的平均估算值更高。然而,仅在两种日粮下15NAN(P小于0.001)、干草日粮下35S(P小于0.05)以及青贮日粮下AAP(P小于0.05)时差异显著。两种日粮下,使用15NAN基于十二指肠来源微生物得出的估算值比使用35S时更高(P小于0.05)。5. 根据用于估算微生物氮的方法,瘤胃中微生物氮合成效率(十二指肠处微生物氮流量/瘤胃中表观消化的每千克有机物)的估算值,青贮日粮在16至38之间,干草日粮在10至46之间。同样,瘤胃中饲料氮降解率的估算值,青贮日粮在0.62至0.97之间,干草日粮在0.00至0.93之间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验