Orem J, Netick A
Brain Res. 1982 Jul 29;244(2):231-41. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90082-8.
Midbrain neurons were recorded in sleep and wakefulness in chronic cats. In the first phase of this study, we attempted to detect respiratory neurons by observing neuronal activity on an oscilloscope and listening to it after audioamplification. We studied 780 neurons in this non-quantitative way and failed to detect any respiratory activity. In the second phase, 203 neurons were analyzed statistically: 15% of these had activity patterns significantly related to the respiratory cycle. In the third and final phase, we studied the details of the activity of midbrain respiratory neurons. Sixteen of 281 single neurons had discharge patterns significantly related to the respiratory cycle, but only 3 of the 16 were related to breathing with a consistency that essentially excluded the possibility of a false positive error. All 3 of these cells were only intermittently respiratory, and the intermittency varied from cell to cell and tended to depend upon the state of consciousness. These results differ substantially from reports that more than 30% of midbrain and diencephalic cells are respiratory neurons. The differences may be explained by the previous authors' use of a statistic, the respiratory nodulation index, that, as shown here and in a previous stimulation study, produces a large number of false positive errors.
在慢性猫身上记录中脑神经元在睡眠和清醒状态下的活动。在本研究的第一阶段,我们试图通过在示波器上观察神经元活动并在音频放大后聆听来检测呼吸神经元。我们以这种非定量的方式研究了780个神经元,但未检测到任何呼吸活动。在第二阶段,对203个神经元进行了统计分析:其中15%的神经元活动模式与呼吸周期有显著相关性。在第三阶段也是最后阶段,我们研究了中脑呼吸神经元活动的细节。281个单个神经元中有16个的放电模式与呼吸周期有显著相关性,但这16个中只有3个与呼吸的相关性具有本质上排除假阳性错误可能性的一致性。这3个细胞均只是间歇性地具有呼吸相关性,且间歇性因细胞而异,并且往往取决于意识状态。这些结果与报道称超过30%的中脑和间脑细胞是呼吸神经元的结果有很大差异。这些差异可能是由于先前作者使用的一种统计方法——呼吸结节指数造成的,正如在此处以及之前的一项刺激研究中所示,该方法会产生大量假阳性错误。