Allegretti C L, Puglisi J T
J Gen Psychol. 1982 Jul;107(1st Half):139-48. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1982.9709915.
Two visual search experiments were conducted to clarify the processes underlying the "word superiority" effect. Ss in both experiments (18 college students in Experiment 1; 18 college students and 18 older adults in Experiment 2) searched six, 50-item stimulus lists for the letters "a" and "r". Each item consisted of a string of four letters forming either a word or a nonword anagram of that word. Items were printed in either uppercase letters, lowercase letters, or mixed-cased letters (e.g., wOrD), resulting in the six stimulus lists. Significant main effects were obtained in the two experiments. Search times were shorter for words than for nonwords, regardless of case. Thus, the word superiority effect was demonstrated even when the visual configuration of the word was disrupted. Search times were also shorter for uppercase and lowercase items (i.e., same-case items) than for mixed-case items, regardless of the word/nonword condition. In addition, older persons (Experiment 2) evidenced slower processing than college students in all stimulus conditions, and their processing was differentially slowed in conditions which prevented automatic (as opposed to effortful) processing. Results were interpreted in terms of automatic information processing.
进行了两项视觉搜索实验,以阐明“单词优势”效应背后的过程。两个实验的被试(实验1中有18名大学生;实验2中有18名大学生和18名老年人)在六个包含50个项目的刺激列表中搜索字母“a”和“r”。每个项目由一串四个字母组成,这些字母要么构成一个单词,要么构成该单词的非单词变位词。项目用大写字母、小写字母或大小写混合字母(例如,wOrD)打印,从而形成六个刺激列表。在这两项实验中均获得了显著的主效应。无论大小写,单词的搜索时间都比非单词短。因此,即使单词的视觉结构被打乱,单词优势效应也得到了证明。无论单词/非单词条件如何,大写和小写项目(即相同大小写的项目)的搜索时间也比大小写混合项目短。此外,老年人(实验2)在所有刺激条件下的处理速度都比大学生慢,并且在阻止自动(与费力相对)处理的条件下,他们的处理速度差异更大。结果根据自动信息处理进行了解释。