• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Detection and recognition masking-level differences for the individual CID W-1 spondaic words.

作者信息

Wilson R H, Hopkins J L, Mance C M, Novak R E

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Jun;25(2):235-42. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2502.235.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2502.235
PMID:7120964
Abstract

The detection and recognition masking-level differences for the 36 individual CID W-1 spondaic words (Technisonic Studios) were established on 36 listeners with normal hearing. The masking for two conditions, SoNo and S pi No, was accomplished with 70-dB-SPL speech-spectrum noise. The word lists were administered in 2-dB decrements with the 36 words presented at each signal-to-noise ratio, which ranged from 9 dB to -19 dB for SoNo and from 3 dB to -25 dB for S pi No. The detection and recognition thresholds determined for each spondaic word under both masking conditions are presented. Additionally, the slopes of the psychometric functions for each word under both conditions are given. The mean masking-level difference (SoNo-S pi No) for the detection-response task was 9.4 dB (SD = .7 dB). The mean masking-level difference for the recognition task was 7.2 dB (SD = 1.4 dB). The recognition masking-level differences for the individual spondaic words ranged from 4.4 dB (stairway) to 10.0 dB (oatmeal). A list of 10 words that had the largest masking-level differences for recognition is suggested to enhance the clinical utility of the masking-level difference for speech.

摘要

相似文献

1
Detection and recognition masking-level differences for the individual CID W-1 spondaic words.
J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Jun;25(2):235-42. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2502.235.
2
A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.正常听力的听众在语音频谱噪声中对PB - 50、CID W - 22、NU - 6、W - 1双音节词以及由同一说话者说出的单音节数字的识别性能比较。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jun;19(6):496-506. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.6.5.
3
Masking-level difference for spondaic words in 2000-msec bursts of broadband noise.
J Am Acad Audiol. 1994 Jul;5(4):236-42.
4
Recognition masking-level differences for 10 CID W-1 spondaic words.10个CID W-1扬扬格词的识别掩蔽级差异。
J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Dec;25(4):624-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2504.624.
5
A comparison of two word-recognition tasks in multitalker babble: Speech Recognition in Noise Test (SPRINT) and Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).在多说话者嘈杂环境中两项单词识别任务的比较:噪声中的语音识别测试(SPRINT)和噪声中的单词测试(WIN)。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 Jul-Aug;19(7):548-56. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19.7.4.
6
Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.听力正常的年轻听众和有听力损失的老年听众在间歇性噪声中的单词识别表现。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Feb;21(2):90-109. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.2.4.
7
Binaural masking level difference for speech signals in noise.
Int J Audiol. 2002 Jul;41(5):279-84. doi: 10.3109/14992020209077187.
8
Spatial audiometry: detection of spondaic words in noise.空间听力测定法:噪声中重读词的检测
J Am Acad Audiol. 1998 Dec;9(6):399-409.
9
Influence of interaural level differences on the speech recognition masking level difference.双耳间声级差对言语识别掩蔽级差的影响。
Audiology. 1985;24(1):15-24. doi: 10.3109/00206098509070093.
10
Psychometrically equivalent spondaic words spoken by a female speaker.由女性说话者说出的心理测量等效的扬扬格词。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Dec;42(6):1336-46. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4206.1336.

引用本文的文献

1
Speech recognition for school-age children and adults tested in multi-tone vs multi-noise-band maskers.多频带噪声掩蔽与多频带噪声掩蔽下测试的学龄儿童和成人的语音识别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Mar;143(3):1458. doi: 10.1121/1.5026795.
2
The binaural masking-level difference of mandarin tone detection and the binaural intelligibility-level difference of mandarin tone recognition in the presence of speech-spectrum noise.在存在语音频谱噪声的情况下,普通话声调检测的双耳掩蔽级差及普通话声调识别的双耳可懂度级差。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(3):e0120977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120977. eCollection 2015.
3
Low-level information and high-level perception: the case of speech in noise.
低层次信息与高层次感知:噪声环境下的言语案例
PLoS Biol. 2008 May 20;6(5):e126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060126.
4
Auditory function in adrenomyeloneuropathy.肾上腺脑白质营养不良中的听觉功能。
J Neurol Sci. 2008 Jun 15;269(1-2):24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.12.011. Epub 2008 Jan 15.