Suppr超能文献

人类对衣原体抗原的免疫反应。

Immune responses to chlamydial antigens in humans.

作者信息

Hanna L, Kerlan R, Senyk G, Stites D P, Juster R P, Jawetz E

出版信息

Med Microbiol Immunol. 1982;171(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02122702.

Abstract

Antibody titer, lymphocyte stimulation and leukocyte migration inhibition with chlamydial antigens were determined repeatedly over many months on human subjects. The volunteers were retrospectively placed into four groups on the basis of clinical, laboratory and epidemiologic criteria. Group A consisted of persons with proven or probable chlamydial infection, including an illness confirmed by chlamydial isolation or seroconversion, or a clinically compatible illness with positive serologic results. Group B were sexual partners or close contacts of group A individuals. Group C were laboratory workers with prolonged exposure to viable chlamydiae or their antigens. Group D included persons of comparable age as those in groups A and B, but lacking a history of symptomatic chlamydial infection or of contact with chlamydiae. Individual cases illustrated the rise of antibody and some cell mediated immunity reactions (CMI) with active chlamydial infection. By contrast, laboratory exposure resulted in elevation of CMI but not of antibody. Statistical analysis of the results in 46 volunteers tested repeatedly indicated a strong association of specific antibody with lymphocyte stimulation, but not with leukocyte migration inhibition. Regression analysis suggested that the type of exposure markedly influenced the relationship between antibody and lymphocyte stimulation. Measurement of immunotype-specific antibody titer by microimmunofluorescence (or an equally sensitive method) remains the best laboratory indicator of past chlamydial infection. Neither antibody nor CMI can, as yet, be definitely related to resistance to re-infection in humans.

摘要

在数月时间里,对人类受试者反复测定了衣原体抗原的抗体滴度、淋巴细胞刺激反应和白细胞游走抑制反应。根据临床、实验室和流行病学标准,将志愿者回顾性地分为四组。A组由已证实或可能感染衣原体的人组成,包括经衣原体分离或血清转化确诊的疾病,或血清学结果呈阳性的临床症状相符的疾病。B组是A组个体的性伴侣或密切接触者。C组是长期接触活衣原体或其抗原的实验室工作人员。D组包括与A组和B组年龄相仿,但无衣原体感染症状或接触衣原体病史的人。个别病例显示,在衣原体活跃感染时抗体升高以及一些细胞介导免疫反应(CMI)。相比之下,实验室接触导致CMI升高,但抗体未升高。对46名反复检测的志愿者的结果进行统计分析表明,特异性抗体与淋巴细胞刺激反应密切相关,但与白细胞游走抑制反应无关。回归分析表明,接触类型显著影响抗体与淋巴细胞刺激反应之间的关系。通过微量免疫荧光法(或同样灵敏的方法)测定免疫型特异性抗体滴度仍然是过去衣原体感染的最佳实验室指标。目前,抗体和CMI都不能明确与人类再次感染的抵抗力相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验