Suppr超能文献

使用计算机断层扫描和超声检查对胆道梗阻评估的前瞻性比较。

A prospective comparison of the evaluation of biliary obstruction using computed tomography and ultrasonography.

作者信息

Baron R L, Stanley R J, Lee J K, Koehler R E, Melson G L, Balfe D M, Weyman P J

出版信息

Radiology. 1982 Oct;145(1):91-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.145.1.7122903.

Abstract

A total of 103 consecutive patients with suspected biliary obstruction were studied using both computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound (US) to evaluate the relative accuracy of the methods. In 47 patients with confirmed obstruction, CT and US were comparable accurate in differentiating obstruction from nonobstruction. The precise level of obstruction was identified by CT in 88% and by US in 60%; the cause of obstruction was accurately predicted by CT in 70% and by US in 38%. Both methods detected useful additional information, such as cholelithiasis or retroperitoneal adenopathy. The authors use US as a screening examination; if there is doubt about the level and cause of sonographically demonstrated obstruction, CT has proved to be an accurate means of further evaluation.

摘要

对103例连续的疑似胆道梗阻患者进行了研究,采用计算机断层扫描(CT)和超声(US)来评估这两种方法的相对准确性。在47例确诊为梗阻的患者中,CT和US在区分梗阻与非梗阻方面的准确性相当。CT能确定88%的梗阻确切部位,US能确定60%;CT能准确预测70%的梗阻原因,US能准确预测38%。两种方法都能检测到有用的额外信息,如胆结石或腹膜后腺病。作者将US用作筛查检查;如果对超声显示的梗阻部位和原因存在疑问,CT已被证明是进一步评估的准确手段。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验