• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地西泮和咪达唑仑作为局部麻醉下支气管镜检查口服术前用药的比较。

Comparison of diazepam and midazolam as oral premedicants for bronchoscopy under local anesthesia.

作者信息

Driessen J J, Smets M J, Goey L S, Booij L H

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1982;33(2):99-105.

PMID:7124323
Abstract

A randomized double blind comparison between diazepam 10 mg, and midazolam 15 mg as oral premedicants in diagnostic fiber optic bronchoscopy under local anesthesia was made. The subjective assessments by the patient, the observer and the bronchoscopist showed that midazolam 15 mg orally gives an at least comparable degree of sedation, relief of anxiety and patient's tolerance as diazepam 10 mg orally. Midazolam 15 mg gives some degree of anterograde amnesia where diazepam 10 mg completely fails. Psychomotor recovery after 4 hours is better after midazolam 15 mg than after diazepam 10 mg. No adverse reactions were seen with both premedicants.

摘要

在局部麻醉下进行诊断性纤维支气管镜检查时,对10毫克地西泮和15毫克咪达唑仑作为口服术前用药进行了随机双盲比较。患者、观察者和支气管镜检查医生的主观评估表明,口服15毫克咪达唑仑产生的镇静程度、焦虑缓解程度和患者耐受性至少与口服10毫克地西泮相当。15毫克咪达唑仑会产生一定程度的顺行性遗忘,而10毫克地西泮则完全没有这种作用。15毫克咪达唑仑用药后4小时的精神运动恢复情况比10毫克地西泮更好。两种术前用药均未观察到不良反应。

相似文献

1
Comparison of diazepam and midazolam as oral premedicants for bronchoscopy under local anesthesia.地西泮和咪达唑仑作为局部麻醉下支气管镜检查口服术前用药的比较。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1982;33(2):99-105.
2
Comparative study of midazolam and diazepam in premedication of bronchoscopy.咪达唑仑与地西泮用于支气管镜检查术前用药的对比研究
Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med. 1991;131:233-41.
3
[Midazolam (Dormicum) as oral premedication for local anesthesia].[咪达唑仑(多美康)作为局部麻醉的口服术前用药]
Anaesthesist. 1987 May;36(5):197-202.
4
Placebo controlled comparison of midazolam, triazolam and diazepam as oral premedicants for outpatient anaesthesia.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1987 Aug;15(3):296-304. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8701500309.
5
[A comparison of midazolam and diazepam for intramuscular premedication].咪达唑仑与地西泮用于肌肉注射术前用药的比较
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1982;1(1):23-7. doi: 10.1016/S0750-7658(82)80072-5.
6
Rectal administration of midazolam versus diazepam for preanesthetic sedation in children.咪达唑仑与地西泮直肠给药用于儿童麻醉前镇静的比较。
Anesth Prog. 1990 Jan-Feb;37(1):29-31.
7
Local anesthetic techniques for bronchoscopies.支气管镜检查的局部麻醉技术。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1984;35 Suppl:389-97.
8
[Comparison of midazolam and hydroxyzine as premedicants for combination of spinal and epidural anesthesia with midazolam sedation].
Masui. 1991 Feb;40(2):184-9.
9
[A comparison of midazolam and diazepam in premedication using the intramuscular route].咪达唑仑与地西泮肌内注射用于术前用药的比较
Cah Anesthesiol. 1991;39(1):15-8.
10
A comparison of midazolam and diazepam for sedation during locoregional anesthesia.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1987;38(1):97-102.