Suppr超能文献

随机对照临床试验。科学与伦理基础。

The randomized controlled clinical trial. Scientific and ethical bases.

作者信息

Spodick D H

出版信息

Am J Med. 1982 Sep;73(3):420-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90746-x.

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials are increasingly accepted in principle but not always in practice, particularly for surgical therapies. Successful surgical randomized controlled trials demonstrate their feasibility, and reports of uncontrolled surgical trials now commonly bear a statement that a definitive answer requires a controlled trial. Scientifically, the randomized controlled trial is the most powerful way to determine a result ascribable only to the trial treatment. Although randomized controlled trials can be imperfect or improperly conducted, they are designed to circumvent biased behavior by investigators. With candor in informed consent, the equal chance not to get a trial treatment makes the randomized controlled trial the most ethical design. Thus, scientific, behavioral, and ethical cases support the randomized controlled trial as the optimal method for investigation of nearly all therapeutic innovations and as a requirement for publication.

摘要

随机对照试验原则上越来越被接受,但在实践中并非总是如此,尤其是对于外科治疗。成功的外科随机对照试验证明了其可行性,现在非对照外科试验的报告通常会声明,明确的答案需要进行对照试验。从科学角度来看,随机对照试验是确定仅归因于试验治疗的结果的最有力方法。尽管随机对照试验可能存在不完美或实施不当的情况,但它们旨在规避研究者的偏倚行为。通过知情同意中的坦诚,不接受试验治疗的平等机会使随机对照试验成为最符合伦理的设计。因此,科学、行为和伦理方面的理由都支持将随机对照试验作为几乎所有治疗创新研究的最佳方法以及发表的要求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验