Suppr超能文献

全髋关节翻修置换术:脓毒症会影响手术结果吗?

Total hip revision arthroplasty: does sepsis influence the results?

作者信息

James E T, Hunter G A, Cameron H U

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Oct(170):88-94.

PMID:7127970
Abstract

The results of revision total hip arthroplasty, with or without sepsis, are compared in a review of the recent literature. In 661 total hip revisions without sepsis, there is an overall 54% excellent/good/satisfactory rate and a 12% infection rate. Of 1063 total hip revisions in the presence of or after sepsis, there is an overall success rate of 73% and a 17% reinfection rate. Comparison of the two groups is difficult due to the different criteria used to diagnose infection, the variable use of parenteral antibiotics and cement impregnated with antibiotics, the frequently short follow-up periods, and the definition of success by different rating s stems. Aside from infection, before advising revision surgery or excision arthroplasty, consideration should be given to the individual patient, the hip to be revised, and the technical skills available. Follow-up should be monitored yearly by an independent examination of the patient, not by chart review or telephone questionnaire. Standardized rating methods should be used, together with strict criteria for the diagnosis of infection. Only in this way will results from different centers be comparable.

摘要

在对近期文献的综述中,对有或无败血症的翻修全髋关节置换术的结果进行了比较。在661例无败血症的全髋关节翻修术中,总体优良/满意率为54%,感染率为12%。在1063例有败血症或败血症后进行的全髋关节翻修术中,总体成功率为73%,再感染率为17%。由于用于诊断感染的标准不同、胃肠外抗生素和含抗生素骨水泥的使用情况各异、随访期往往较短以及不同评分系统对成功的定义不同,两组之间的比较存在困难。除感染外,在建议进行翻修手术或切除关节成形术之前,应考虑个体患者、要翻修的髋关节以及现有的技术水平。应每年通过对患者进行独立检查来监测随访情况,而不是通过查阅病历或电话问卷调查。应使用标准化的评分方法,并采用严格的感染诊断标准。只有这样,不同中心的结果才具有可比性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验