Wroblewski B M
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Oct(170):56-61.
Revisions in failed total hip arthroplasty have produced some good results. In cases of stem fracture, the problem is lack or loss of proximal support in the presence of distal fixation of the stem. This aspect must be borne in mind during primary and revision surgery. Routine use of long intramedullary stems has little to commend it. Proximal support of the stem is essential. In revision for deep sepsis, antibiotic-loaded cement has increased the success rate. Sound component fixation is, however, of paramount importance. If success is to be achieved in revision surgery, the patients at risk must be carefully followed up by serial radiographs. The timing of the revision will depend on awareness of the problem rather than the patients' symptoms. This, at times, may mean revising early and for radiographic changes alone if the quality of the bone stock is to be preserved, and if the chances of success are to be improved.
失败的全髋关节置换术翻修已取得了一些良好效果。在假体柄骨折的病例中,问题在于假体柄远端固定的情况下近端支撑不足或缺失。在初次手术和翻修手术过程中都必须牢记这一点。常规使用长髓内柄几乎没有什么可取之处。假体柄的近端支撑至关重要。在因深部感染进行翻修时,含抗生素骨水泥提高了成功率。然而,可靠的假体组件固定最为重要。若要在翻修手术中取得成功,必须通过系列X线片对高危患者进行仔细随访。翻修的时机将取决于对问题的认识,而非患者的症状。有时,如果要保留骨量并提高成功几率,这可能意味着仅因影像学改变就尽早进行翻修。