Suppr超能文献

[年轻非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(MODY型)的氯磺丙脲-酒精潮红试验]

[Chlorpropamide-alcohol flush test in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in young age (MODY type)].

作者信息

Panzram G, Adolph W

出版信息

Endokrinologie. 1982 Jun;79(2):221-6.

PMID:7128541
Abstract

The chlorpropamide alcohol flush test (CPAF) has been described as a dominantly inherited feature in NIDDM, particularly of young people (MODY-type). Validity and usefulness of the CPAF were analyzed in 40 MODY-patients recruiting from a population study (criteria acc. to Tattersall and Fajans, 1975), 59 first degree relatives (24 diabetics, 35 non-diabetics), 40 NIDDM of maturity onset, 40 IDDM, and 40 healthy controls. The CPAF (single challenge test, placebo control, subjective evaluation by questionnaire acc. to Köbberling, 1980) proved to be positive in only 8 MODY-patients and 5 of diabetic first-degree relatives. In comparison to NIDDM of maturity onset (40/8), IDDM (40/6) and healthy controls (40/2) the frequency of positive CPAF showed no significant differences. Between flushers and non-flushers within the MODY-group no relationship to vascular findings, metabolic and genetic data (including HLA-typing) could be found. It is concluded that the CPAF is a real but rather nonspecific phenomenon unsuitable as a genetic marker.

摘要

氯磺丙脲酒精潮红试验(CPAF)被描述为非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM),尤其是年轻人(青少年发病型糖尿病,MODY型)的一种显性遗传特征。在一项人群研究中招募的40例MODY患者(标准符合Tattersall和Fajans,1975年)、59名一级亲属(24名糖尿病患者,35名非糖尿病患者)、40例成年起病的NIDDM患者、40例胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)患者和40名健康对照中分析了CPAF的有效性和实用性。CPAF(单次激发试验,安慰剂对照,根据Köbberling,1980年通过问卷进行主观评估)仅在8例MODY患者和5名糖尿病一级亲属中呈阳性。与成年起病的NIDDM患者(40/8)、IDDM患者(40/6)和健康对照(40/2)相比,CPAF阳性的频率没有显著差异。在MODY组的潮红者和非潮红者之间,未发现与血管病变、代谢和遗传数据(包括HLA分型)有相关性。结论是,CPAF是一种真实但相当非特异性的现象,不适合作遗传标记。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验