Wright-Pascoe R, Mills J, Choo-Kang E, Morrison E Y
Department of Medicine, University of the West Indies, Kingston, Jamaica.
West Indian Med J. 2000 Jun;49(2):138-42.
We investigated twenty-one insulin-using patients, who had all been labelled as having insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) or type 1 diabetes. Physicians have been erroneously using the term IDDM loosely to include all diabetics on insulin. The clinical criteria of the National Diabetes Data Group/WHO were used to reclassify these patients. Only thirteen were found to have IDDM and eight non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Using fasting C-peptide values, only five of the thirteen with clinical IDDM truly had IDDM, the others might have maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) or diabetes in the young. Of the eight with clinical NIDDM seven had normal to high C-peptide values; the lone patient with low C-peptide values had diabetes diagnosed at age 64 years. We conclude that the clinical classification of diabetes mellitus may be inaccurate and that C-peptide evaluation improves the accuracy of the classification.
我们调查了21名使用胰岛素的患者,他们都被诊断为胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDDM)或1型糖尿病。医生一直错误地宽泛使用IDDM这一术语,将所有使用胰岛素的糖尿病患者都包括在内。我们采用美国国家糖尿病数据组/世界卫生组织的临床标准对这些患者重新进行分类。结果发现,只有13人患有IDDM,8人患有非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)。根据空腹C肽值,13名临床诊断为IDDM的患者中只有5人真正患有IDDM,其他人可能患有青年发病的成年型糖尿病(MODY)或青少年糖尿病。8名临床诊断为NIDDM的患者中,7人的C肽值正常或偏高;唯一一名C肽值低的患者在64岁时被诊断出患有糖尿病。我们得出结论,糖尿病的临床分类可能不准确,而C肽评估可提高分类的准确性。