• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口吃作为操作性行为:言语刺激“错误”“正确”和“树”对学龄口吃者和非口吃者不流畅率的影响。

Stuttering as operant behavior: effects of the verbal stimuli wrong, right, and tree on the disfluency rates of school-age stutterers and nonstutterers.

作者信息

Daly D A, Kimbarow M L

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Sep;21(3):589-97. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2103.589.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.2103.589
PMID:713525
Abstract

This study assessed the effects of the verbally presented stimuli wrong, right, and tree on the frequency of disfluencies during oral reading by 18 school-aged stutterers and 18 matched nonstutterers. No differences were found between the three stimulus words' effect on the disfluency rate of either subject group. Because decreases in the disfluency rates of stutterers were observed during the presentation of all three stimulus words, the data failed to support the operant model. A discussion of theoretical and experimental implications is given.

摘要

本研究评估了以口头方式呈现的刺激词“错误”“正确”和“树”对18名学龄期口吃者和18名匹配的非口吃者在朗读时言语不流畅频率的影响。在两个受试组中,未发现这三个刺激词对言语不流畅率的影响存在差异。由于在呈现所有三个刺激词的过程中均观察到口吃者言语不流畅率有所下降,因此数据未能支持操作性模型。文中还对理论和实验意义进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Stuttering as operant behavior: effects of the verbal stimuli wrong, right, and tree on the disfluency rates of school-age stutterers and nonstutterers.口吃作为操作性行为:言语刺激“错误”“正确”和“树”对学龄口吃者和非口吃者不流畅率的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1978 Sep;21(3):589-97. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2103.589.
2
The effect of the verbal stimulus words wrong, right, and tree on the disfluency rates of stutterers and nonstutterers.言语刺激词“错误”“正确”和“树”对口吃者和非口吃者言语不流畅率的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1970 Jun;13(2):239-44. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1302.239.
3
Subvocalization and reading rate differences between stuttering and nonstuttering children and adults.口吃儿童和成人与非口吃儿童和成人之间的默读和阅读速度差异。
J Speech Hear Res. 1990 Dec;33(4):776-85. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3304.776.
4
Interruptions as a variable in stuttering and disfluency.口吃和言语不流畅中的干扰因素作为一个变量
J Speech Hear Res. 1985 Sep;28(3):428-35. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2803.435.
5
Preliminary study of disfluency in school-aged children with autism.自闭症儿童口语不流畅的初步研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Jan-Feb;49(1):75-89. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12048. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
6
Disfluency behavior of elementary school stutterers and nonstutterers: the adaptation effect.小学口吃者和非口吃者的不流畅行为:适应效应。
J Speech Hear Res. 1968 Sep;11(3):622-30. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1103.622.
7
Early syllable dysfluency in stutterers and nonstutterers: a preliminary report.口吃者与非口吃者的早期音节不流畅性:初步报告。
J Commun Disord. 1974 Sep;7(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(74)90039-2.
8
Influence of reading level difficulty on the disfluencies of normal children.阅读水平难度对正常儿童言语不流畅的影响。
J Speech Hear Res. 1977 Sep;20(3):475-84. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2003.475.
9
Disfluency behavior of elementary-school stutterers and nonstutterers: the consistency effect.小学口吃者和非口吃者的不流畅行为:一致性效应。
J Speech Hear Res. 1969 Jun;12(2):301-7. doi: 10.1044/jshr.1202.301.
10
Speech disfluencies and delayed auditory feedback reactions of stuttering and non-stuttering children.口吃儿童与非口吃儿童的言语不流畅及延迟听觉反馈反应
Percept Mot Skills. 1978 Dec;47(3 Pt 1):859-62. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.3.859.