Zhuang H, Coulepis A G, Zimmet P, Taylor R, Ram P, Banuve S, Gust I D
Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Oct;116(4):608-16. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113443.
A batch of 984 sera obtained from a stratified sample of Melanesians and Indians living in rural and urban areas of Fiji in 1981 were for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) by solid phase radioimmunoassay. The prevalence of hepatitis B infection (as measured by the sum of HBsAg and anti-HBc frequencies of HBsAg negative sera in the two groups) was 81.5% and 17.9%, respectively. No major differences were detected between urban and rural populations. While hepatitis B virus is endemic in Melanesians and Indians, the epidemiology of the infection shows certain differences. Among Melanesians, infection appears to be acquired early in life and peak prevalence of serologic markers of infection occurs during the second decade. Among the Indian population, the prevalence of markers increases steadily with age, presumably as a result of continuous exposure and infection throughout life. the high prevalence of infection and carriers among Melanesians is consistent with previous observations among Pacific populations. The lower prevalence of infection among Indians is remarkable, since they constitute almost half of the total population and live under similar conditions. Since the two populations remain largely separate in terms of housing and schooling, and intermarriage is uncommon, it is no possible to determine whether these differences merely represent different degrees of exposure to the virus or are the reflection of differences in susceptibility or response to infection.
1981年从居住在斐济农村和城市地区的美拉尼西亚人和印度人的分层样本中获取了一批984份血清,采用固相放射免疫测定法检测乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)和乙肝核心抗原抗体(抗-HBc)。乙肝感染的流行率(以两组中HBsAg阴性血清的HBsAg和抗-HBc频率之和衡量)分别为81.5%和17.9%。未检测到城乡人口之间存在重大差异。虽然乙肝病毒在美拉尼西亚人和印度人中呈地方性流行,但感染的流行病学显示出某些差异。在美拉尼西亚人中,感染似乎在生命早期获得,感染血清学标志物的流行率峰值出现在第二个十年。在印度人群中,标志物的流行率随年龄稳步上升,可能是由于一生中持续接触和感染的结果。美拉尼西亚人中感染和携带者的高流行率与之前在太平洋人群中的观察结果一致。印度人中较低的感染流行率值得注意,因为他们几乎占总人口的一半,且生活在类似条件下。由于这两个人群在住房和上学方面基本保持分离,且通婚并不常见,因此无法确定这些差异仅仅是代表对病毒的不同暴露程度,还是对感染易感性或反应差异的反映。