Taylor R, Sladden T, Levy S, Gust I, Macaskill P, Rushworth L, Gaxibarich G
Department of Public Health, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1991 Dec;22(4):567-76.
Hepatitis B immunization for health care workers is common policy in many countries where they constitute a particular at risk group. A seroepidemiological study of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in Fiji health care workers was conducted to determine whether this occupational group (or subgroups thereof) were at higher risk of infection than the general Fiji population. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether health staff should be immunized, or whether it would be more productive to focus resources on neonatal immunization. Blood samples were obtained from 2,639 health workers and the sera analysed by radio-immunoassay for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs). Prevalence rates of HBV markers of infection were compared with those observed in the general population, from a previous population-based cluster sample survey. Approximately 70% of the health care staff participated in the study. Prevalence of total HBV markers was 24%. The rate of HBsAg was 5%. Sex and ethnic group specific prevalence rates varied. Male subjects, Fijians and "other" Pacific Islanders all experienced higher rates of infection. Rural/urban and age related trends were also observed. Rates of infection in health staff were lower than those reported in the general population. Previous studies have indicated that most of the transmission of hepatitis B in hyperemdemic Pacific populations occurs at birth or within the next few years. There was no consistent pattern of hepatitis B infection in different occupational groups of health care workers. Certain relatively socially homogeneous subgroups of health workers were analysed separately, and among these health workers there was evidence for increased risk of infection due to exposure to blood or used hypodermic syringes, but not due to patient contact. Until health staff assume a higher risk of infection than the general Fijian population, efforts directed at community-wide control of hepatitis B continue to be the most appropriate use of resources.
在许多国家,为医护人员接种乙肝疫苗是一项普遍政策,因为他们构成了一个特殊的高危群体。对斐济医护人员进行了一项乙肝病毒(HBV)血清流行病学研究,以确定这一职业群体(或其亚组)是否比斐济普通人群感染风险更高。本研究的目的是确定医护人员是否应该接种疫苗,或者将资源集中于新生儿免疫接种是否会更有成效。从2639名医护人员中采集血样,并用放射免疫分析法分析血清中的乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)和乙肝表面抗体(抗-HBs)。将感染的HBV标志物患病率与之前基于人群的整群抽样调查中普通人群的患病率进行比较。约70%的医护人员参与了研究。HBV标志物总患病率为24%。HBsAg率为5%。性别和种族特异性患病率各不相同。男性受试者、斐济人和“其他”太平洋岛民的感染率都较高。还观察到了城乡和年龄相关趋势。医护人员的感染率低于普通人群报告的感染率。先前的研究表明,在乙肝高流行的太平洋人群中,大多数乙肝传播发生在出生时或随后几年内。不同职业组的医护人员中没有一致的乙肝感染模式。对某些相对社会同质性较高的医护人员亚组进行了单独分析,在这些医护人员中,有证据表明因接触血液或用过的皮下注射器而感染风险增加,但不是因接触患者。在医护人员感染风险高于斐济普通人群之前,针对全社区乙肝控制的努力仍然是资源的最恰当利用方式。