Moscovice I S, Rosenblatt R A
Am J Public Health. 1982 Dec;72(12):1380-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.12.1380.
This paper examines the experience of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Rural Practice Project (RPP), a major non-governmental effort in the last decade concentrating on the direct delivery of rural health services. The nine RPP sites started prior to 1977 showed a slow but steady increase in their utilization levels and improvement in their financial status during their initial operational years. The tempo of their development was remarkably similar to that of federally sponsored practices in underserved rural areas. After four years of operation, all of the practices had completed their period of grant support; the practices survived in all cases, with almost all of the practices still retaining community sponsorship, salaried physicians, and a commitment to comprehensive care. Practices in sparsely populated rural areas and in areas with fewer hospital beds grew more slowly than those set in rural areas with higher population density and more ancillary resources. We conclude that the use of time-limited initial subsidies is an effective strategy in starting new rural practices in underserved areas and that those practices have a good chance of surviving their start-up phase.
本文考察了罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会农村医疗项目(RPP)的经验,这是过去十年中一项主要的非政府举措,专注于直接提供农村医疗服务。1977年之前启动的九个RPP站点在其初始运营年份的利用率水平呈缓慢但稳定的上升趋势,财务状况也有所改善。它们的发展节奏与联邦政府在农村服务欠缺地区所资助项目的发展节奏极为相似。运营四年后,所有项目都已完成拨款支持期;所有项目都得以存续,几乎所有项目仍保留社区赞助、薪资医生以及提供全面护理的承诺。人口稀少的农村地区以及病床较少地区的项目发展速度比人口密度较高且辅助资源更多的农村地区的项目发展速度要慢。我们得出结论,使用限时初始补贴是在服务欠缺地区启动新的农村医疗项目的有效策略,并且这些项目在启动阶段有很大机会存活下来。