• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调节药物线索敏感性的因素:芬太尼剂量-剂量辨别中剂量比和绝对剂量水平的影响。

Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: the effects of dose ratio and absolute dose level in the case of fentanyl dose-dose discrimination.

作者信息

Colpaert F C, Janssen P A

出版信息

Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1982 Aug;258(2):283-99.

PMID:7138151
Abstract

This study presents a parametric analysis of the difference case in drug discrimination; rats were trained to discriminate a higher training dose of fentanyl, a narcotic analgesic, from a lower dose. Two parameters of dose-dose discrimination were investigated. First, dose ratio indicates the magnitude of the difference, expressed as a ratio, between the higher and the lower of the two training doses; dose ratios were 2, 4, 8, and 16 in four groups of animals. The second parameter is the absolute level of fentanyl dose at which any given ratio can be discriminated; in all four groups, the higher of the two training doses was progressively lowered from 0.04 to 0.00125 mg/kg. It was found that dose-dose discriminability of fentanyl was proportional to dose ratio in the entire 2 to 16 range of dose ratio, and that discriminability decreased monotonically as the absolute dose level was lower. Bias in discriminative responding was determined by absolute dose level only; dose ratio exerted no effect. The slope of the fentanyl generalization gradient increased as the dose ratio was smaller, and decreased as the absolute dose level was lower. Both dose ratio and absolute dose level also exerted effects on the ED50-value, but the effects of dose ratio were apparent only at higher training doses of 0.04 to 0.01 mg/kg. The data are consistent with the suggestion that fentanyl-saline discrimination is a special case of dose-dose discrimination; it is similar to the case where the higher of two training doses differs about 16-fold from the lower one. At this point, the lower training dose produces only liminal effects.

摘要

本研究呈现了药物辨别差异情况的参数分析;训练大鼠区分麻醉性镇痛药芬太尼的较高训练剂量与较低剂量。研究了剂量 - 剂量辨别的两个参数。首先,剂量比表示较高和较低两个训练剂量之间以比率形式表示的差异大小;四组动物的剂量比分别为2、4、8和16。第二个参数是能够辨别任何给定比率的芬太尼剂量的绝对水平;在所有四组中,两个训练剂量中的较高剂量从0.04mg/kg逐渐降低至0.00125mg/kg。研究发现,在整个2至16的剂量比范围内,芬太尼的剂量 - 剂量辨别能力与剂量比成正比,并且随着绝对剂量水平降低,辨别能力单调下降。辨别反应的偏差仅由绝对剂量水平决定;剂量比对其没有影响。芬太尼泛化梯度的斜率随着剂量比变小而增加,随着绝对剂量水平降低而减小。剂量比和绝对剂量水平也对半数有效剂量(ED50)值产生影响,但剂量比的影响仅在0.04至0.01mg/kg的较高训练剂量时才明显。这些数据与以下观点一致,即芬太尼 - 生理盐水辨别是剂量 - 剂量辨别的一种特殊情况;它类似于两个训练剂量中较高剂量比低剂量高约16倍的情况。此时,较低的训练剂量仅产生阈限效应。

相似文献

1
Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: the effects of dose ratio and absolute dose level in the case of fentanyl dose-dose discrimination.调节药物线索敏感性的因素:芬太尼剂量-剂量辨别中剂量比和绝对剂量水平的影响。
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1982 Aug;258(2):283-99.
2
Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in fentanyl-saline discrimination.调节药物线索敏感性的因素:辨别力的局限性以及在芬太尼-生理盐水辨别中逐渐降低训练剂量的作用。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1980 Mar;212(3):474-80.
3
Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: the effect of frustrative non-reward in fentanyl-saline discrimination.调节药物线索敏感性的因素:在芬太尼-生理盐水辨别实验中挫折性无奖赏的影响
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1981 Dec;254(2):241-51.
4
Discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine in rats trained to discriminate 1.25 mg/kg clozapine vs. 5.0 mg/kg clozapine vs. vehicle.在训练大鼠区分1.25毫克/千克氯氮平、5.0毫克/千克氯氮平与赋形剂的实验中,非典型抗精神病药物氯氮平的辨别性刺激特性。
Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Mar;17(2):185-94. doi: 10.1097/01.fbp.0000197457.70774.91.
5
Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in cocaine-saline discrimination.
Neuropharmacology. 1982 Nov;21(11):1187-94. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(82)90178-2.
6
Increased naloxone reversibility in fentanyl dose-dose discrimination.纳洛酮在芬太尼剂量-剂量辨别中的可逆性增加。
Eur J Pharmacol. 1982 Oct 22;84(3-4):229-31. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(82)90208-4.
7
Discriminative stimulus effect of phenylephrine.
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1991 Jan-Feb;309:20-31.
8
Agonist and antagonist effects of prototype opiate drugs in fentanyl dose-dose discrimination.原型阿片类药物在芬太尼剂量-剂量辨别中的激动剂和拮抗剂作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986;90(2):222-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00181246.
9
Discriminative stimulus effects of opioids in pigeons trained to discriminate fentanyl, bremazocine and water: evidence of pharmacological selectivity.在经训练可区分芬太尼、布瑞马唑辛和水的鸽子中阿片类药物的辨别刺激效应:药理学选择性的证据。
Behav Pharmacol. 1997 Jun;8(2-3):160-73.
10
Separation of the response rate and discriminative stimulus effects of phencyclidine: training dose as a factor in phencyclidine-saline discrimination.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Apr;241(1):159-65.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug discrimination under a concurrent fixed-ratio fixed-ratio schedule.在同时进行的固定比率-固定比率时间表下的药物辨别
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Sep;72(2):187-204. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.72-187.
2
Behavioral contingencies modulate tolerance to discriminative stimulus effects of morphine.行为偶联调节对吗啡辨别性刺激效应的耐受性。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 Jun;125(3):220-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02247332.
3
Empirical evidence that the state dependence and drug discrimination paradigms can generate different outcomes.有经验证据表明状态依赖性和药物辨别范式会产生不同的结果。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Aug;120(3):272-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02311174.
4
Drug discrimination procedures: roles of relative stimulus control in two-drug cases.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;86(4):444-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00427906.
5
Agonist and antagonist effects of prototype opiate drugs in fentanyl dose-dose discrimination.原型阿片类药物在芬太尼剂量-剂量辨别中的激动剂和拮抗剂作用。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986;90(2):222-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00181246.
6
Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1982-1983.1982 - 1983年,利用交叉索引书目分析药物辨别研究的趋势。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1985;86(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00431677.