Boyd J H, Burke J D, Gruenberg E, Holzer C E, Rae D S, George L K, Karno M, Stoltzman R, McEvoy L, Nestadt G
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Oct;41(10):983-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790210065008.
The diagnostic criteria of the third edition of the DSM-III often state that one diagnosis cannot be made if it is "due to" another disorder. Using data from the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule, with a sample of 11,519 subjects from a community population, we found that if two disorders were related to each other according to the DSM-III exclusion criteria, then the presence of a dominant disorder greatly increased the odds of having the excluded disorder. We also found that disorders, which DSM-III says are related to each other, were more strongly associated than disorders, which DSM-III says are unrelated. However, we also found there was a general tendency toward co-occurrence, so that the presence of any disorder increased the odds of having almost any other disorder, even if DSM-III does not list it as a related disorder. We concluded that empirical studies are needed to study the assumptions underlying the use of a diagnostic hierarchy.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)的诊断标准常常指出,如果一种诊断是“由”另一种障碍“所致”,则不能做出该诊断。利用美国国立精神卫生研究所诊断访谈表的数据,对来自社区人群的11519名受试者进行抽样,我们发现,如果根据DSM - III的排除标准两种障碍相互关联,那么一种主要障碍的存在会大大增加患被排除障碍的几率。我们还发现,DSM - III称相互关联的障碍之间的关联比DSM - III称不相关的障碍之间的关联更强。然而,我们也发现存在共病的普遍趋势,即任何一种障碍的存在都会增加患几乎任何其他障碍的几率,即使DSM - III未将其列为相关障碍。我们得出结论,需要进行实证研究来探讨使用诊断层级背后的假设。