Pass A F, Levi D M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982 Dec;23(6):780-6.
Thresholds for detection and discrimination of the polarity (phase) of repetitive gratings with a ramp luminance profile were compared to sine-wave thresholds in normal and amblyopic observers. In the high-frequency range (4 cy/deg), normal observers detected ramp-wave gratings when the contrast of the fundamental spatial frequency was close to its independent threshold and discriminated the polarity (phase) of the ramp when the second harmonic reached its independent threshold. For the amblyopic eyes, detection of the ramp also occurred when the contrast of the fundamental frequency was near its independent threshold. In contrast, discrimination of the polarity (phase) of the ramp required contrast levels 2 to 10 times greater than needed to detect the second harmonic. The reduced ability of the amblyopic eye to discriminate the polarity of the ramp represents an abnormality in phase processing and appears to be roughly proportional to athe reduced optotype acuity of the amblyopic eyes.
在正常和弱视观察者中,将具有斜坡亮度分布的重复光栅的极性(相位)检测和辨别阈值与正弦波阈值进行了比较。在高频范围(4 周/度),当基频空间频率的对比度接近其独立阈值时,正常观察者能够检测到斜坡波光栅,当二次谐波达到其独立阈值时能够辨别斜坡的极性(相位)。对于弱视眼,当基频对比度接近其独立阈值时也能检测到斜坡。相比之下,辨别斜坡的极性(相位)所需的对比度水平比检测二次谐波所需的对比度水平高 2 至 10 倍。弱视眼辨别斜坡极性的能力降低代表了相位处理异常,并且似乎与弱视眼视力表视力降低大致成比例。