Lotz P R
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1982 Oct;6(5):920-2. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198210000-00009.
Forty patients undergoing metrizamide computed tomographic cisternography (MCTC) were prospectively evaluated for the relative merits of prone and supine positioning for the intracranial delivery of the subarachnoid contrast material. Twenty patients were prone and 20 supine when tilted head downward. The degree of opacification was deemed satisfactory or unsatisfactory in each case for the various ventricles and for the suprasellar, quadrigeminal, perimesencephalic, and cerebellopontine angle cisterns. The visualization of the suprasellar and perimesencephalic cisterns was much more often satisfactory using a prone delivery (p less than or equal to 0.05 by Fisher exact test). None of these structures was opacified significantly better with the patient supine. A prone delivery is therefore recommended for most of the common indications for MCTC.
对40例行甲泛葡胺计算机断层脑池造影(MCTC)的患者进行前瞻性评估,以确定俯卧位和仰卧位在蛛网膜下腔造影剂颅内给药中的相对优势。20例患者在头向下倾斜时采取俯卧位,20例采取仰卧位。对各个脑室以及鞍上、四叠体、中脑周围和桥小脑角脑池的显影程度在每种情况下判定为满意或不满意。使用俯卧位给药时,鞍上和中脑周围脑池的显影更常令人满意(Fisher精确检验,p≤0.05)。患者仰卧时,这些结构中没有一个显影明显更好。因此,对于MCTC的大多数常见适应证,建议采用俯卧位给药。